Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: blake_paterson who wrote (55567)	9/27/2000 7:38:44 PM
From: gnuman	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

Hey, Blake. Let's not start counting links as a measure of value. We'll get flooded with Yahoo! <G> A question for you. Do you think that double data rate synchronous DRAM is slower than single data rate synchronous DRAM? Do the names of the devices give a clue? (I saw a whole series of posts to that effect). There may be beta platforms where DDR is slower than SDR in some benchmarks, but it's not a measure of the capability of the devices, but of the capabilities of the platforms. Even then, as scumbria points out, there are benchmarks on which the PIII will outperform Athlon, regardless of the memory type. And we've yet to see a PIII/DDR system to get a real DDR/SDRAM comparison.. And so far we haven't seen one benchmark from a manufacturer. Let's wait till we see something on production systems. That said, I still look for SDRAM to get ~80% share in 2001. <VBG> (I'll respond to your witty reply tomorrow). <G>