SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave B who wrote (55837)9/29/2000 12:30:11 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Dave,

It seems no one was interested in having the graphics engine on the processor. Isn't this at least partly why Cyrix died?

The failure of MXi was due to CPU core problems rather than graphics problems. It may be true that onboard graphics are not a great idea, due to the rapid obsolesence of graphics products.

And Via is planning on introducing new versions of their MediaGX processor, from what I understand -- it'll be interesting to see how successful they are.

Actually VIA does not own rights to MediaGX. National kept that part of the business, and I have heard rumors that they do have a new product coming out shortly.

Scumbria



To: Dave B who wrote (55837)9/29/2000 12:38:01 PM
From: Jdaasoc  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Dave:
Intel cancels Timna

IMO Intel canceling Timna means their vision of what the $599 home computer or set top box processor has been rejected by the industry.
Samsung, Sony VIA and others have plans for the $200-300 type devices that may not need a Intel microprocessor.
By the way, what share does RCA have of the TV market or Amana in the microwave oven business.

john



To: Dave B who wrote (55837)9/29/2000 12:39:31 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Glad to see it go. It was going to be a flop anyway. A chip without a market. And we all know how well Cyrix did with an integrated graphics processor.

BTW, what's the deal with Intel and graphics on the CPU? I don't know anyone that uses them. Am I missing something? I'm sure it makes their integrated CPUs more expensive to include that in there, so why do it since nobody uses it? And it's not like they've had fast GPUs in the past.