Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (111796)	9/29/2000 1:16:54 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten, Are you going to be at MPF this year? Scumbria

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (111796)	9/29/2000 1:35:47 PM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten, Re: That really stinks Among the recent events, I would say the Timna one is kind of neutral. It should be quite normal for any company to have multiple projects in development and canceling some as needed is the correct way for a responsible management. The worst is the Europe woe(if that is the real cause) which just don't have a logical explanation at all. I kind of agree with JDN in his colorful post about this. gary

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (111796)	9/29/2000 2:46:51 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten: I'm not a tech guy so maybe I am being simplistic, but I never could understand why TIMNA, which was a low end processor would use rdram, anyway. Maybe the company felt that this part of the market would be better served by old Celerons at better manufacturing efficiencies? Is this too wrong? TIA