To: Michael F. Donadio who wrote (35950 ) 10/1/2000 12:49:53 AM From: QwikSand Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865 I tend to mostly agree with Eric. No one who has been to enough conferences and announcements is surprised when demos don't work. Unlike rudedog, I've personally been at several Microsoft developer and hardware conferences where half the demos crashed, blue screens abounded, and the whole thing looked like a circus with Bill G as ringmaster. I've also seen my share of failed Sun demos. If you go to enough demos, you realize that they just don't work a lot of the time. People are trying to set things up on stages and in booths minutes or hours before the demo under a lot of time pressure. Little variables that aren't supposed to matter end up mattering. It's vulnerable to every kind of Murphy's Law mishap. These things happen. However, sometimes the head guy puts his foot down and says: show me your plan to make this demo bulletproof, and I don't want to hear any reasons why you can't. I think Microsoft got into that mode after enough disasters. It doesn't look like Sun has. Because demos are demos, this too shall pass. What really matters is not the demo but rather the timely launch of a stable, well-performing product that has customers ready to buy. But this critical grid computing idea is something that's hard for laymen and probably even a lot of computer press to really understand. It's a differentiator for Sun's vision. It has to be demonstrated with utter simplicity, punch and clarity, not with a crashy clown show and improvised slides illustrating a graduate-level computer science lecture. Everybody knows what the Ultra III is, but this grid computing concept is quite another story. It's the case where Zander should have said, "If this isn't going over perfectly, then let's wait. Now convince me it's going to go over perfectly, not just in your lab, but there onstage." I am disappointed with this screwup. It's not like Sun. --QS