Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (109298)	10/1/2000 10:13:10 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>> I would have made a very large amount of money just following everything William had done not to mention Mark and others. << Glenn, Do you remember KIS, and how you agreed with his ejection from the winners circle ? Do you know the topic that prompted that ejection ? I know you said you were busy that day. But you also said that you reviewed the posts and agreed with the ejection. Anyway, the topic at the time was regarding Prince Al-Waleed and how his investment in companies (including Apple) should be viewed as a sign the company and its stock will do very well. One thing led to another. KIS called W a hypocrite, and W responded by revoking KIS's ability to call him names on his own thread. Well Apple crashed. From 70 when W was using Al-Waleed as a reference to 25 a few days ago. Please name ONE company the new economists like that isn't just inflated hot air, and is subject to crashing when the pumping gets too ridiculous to believe by even the most gullible speculators. That is the result of one after the other or W's picks. I don't know much about the list he proffered, but one stands out. Teriyon or whatever. He is actually mentioning that as an example of a sane stock pick? From 125 to 35 in six months. His whole list is nothing but hot air, and one after another they are popping. He is very lucky to have cashed out at a good time. But anyone who had stayed with his picks would be bankrupt by now. There was a special time when idiots with a little money fell for a big scam by brokerages and lost all their money. The big winners were the brokers and a few people who made crazy gambles on greater fool speculations. It happens that the greater fools had a lot of money from the full-employment economy and they were ripe for picking. And they were picked clean by the brokers and analysts that your new econ friends are so fond of. But the game has changed. What was the worth of Mark's tip to you regarding ADCT ? I don't know what else they advise you on the other thread. But my guess is that it was equally worthless.