SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (112066)10/2/2000 12:33:51 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "Credite Suisse reported this morning that 1GHz is still having serious yield problems"

This is a misuse of the term "yield" as that term is a measure of defects, not frequency distribution. Can you define "serious problem" for me? Then I can comment. If they mean the binsplit is not 100% then they are correct. However with Intel's production of processors about 10x AMD ability to produce Athlons, even a 10% binsplit would mean Intel's 1GHz production is equal to AMD's entire Athlon output.

Do you go to your semiconductor manufacturer for economic analysis?

EP



To: Scumbria who wrote (112066)10/2/2000 12:49:13 PM
From: GVTucker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria, RE: >Credite Suisse reported this morning that 1GHz is still having serious yield problems

That is a little different than how I read the CSFB report.

In the executive summary, the blurb states:

Finally, it appears that lower output of 1-GHz and other faster Pentium-3 chips was due to hastily implemented mask-sets--not manufacturing yields or design problems--that caused slower-than-expected speed outputs. A catch-up to plan should occur by January.

The report goes on to describe generally how masks are made (which was by itself beyond me), and why the P3 was having a problem there. The analyst feels that Intel has finally targeted the problem and is in the process of correcting it.

I took a positive connotation from the report rather than the negative connotation that you read.