Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LemonHead who wrote (13036)	10/3/2000 1:18:07 AM
From: Dataminer1	Respond to of 18928

Hi Keith, 1 06/29/2000 ($ 11.94) - 08/02/2000 ($ 4.8) 23 -59.79% 2 08/02/2000 ($ 4.8) - 09/05/2000 ($ 10) 23 + 108.33% 3 09/05/2000 ($ 10) - 09/13/2000 ($ 7.31) 6 -26.9% 4 09/13/2000 ($ 7.31) - 09/25/2000 ($ 8.77) 8 + 19.97% That is the beginning and ending information on each swing. It appears that the high and low points of each cycle are displayed along with the amount of the swing. It makes sense to me. We didn't create this tool, our friend Andy at secretrollingstocks did. We thought it might be useful, but haven't really tested the selections yet. Just another cool tool in our arsenal. Regards, D1

To: LemonHead who wrote (13036)	10/3/2000 4:28:48 AM
From: Jack Jagernauth	Respond to of 18928

Keith, By following the historical pricing and banging on my old guitar, I can't seam to follow the rhythm here. 1 06/29/2000 ($ 11.94) - 08/02/2000 ($ 4.8) 23 -59.79% 2 08/02/2000 ($ 4.8) - 09/05/2000 ($ 10) 23 + 108.33% 3 09/05/2000 ($ 10) - 09/13/2000 ($ 7.31) 6 -26.9% 4 09/13/2000 ($ 7.31) - 09/25/2000 ($ 8.77) 8 + 19.97% The reason you can't seem to follow the rhythm is probably that there is no rhythm here, Keith :) The first and second swings would have generated several AIM trades; however, the last two swings would most likely not have resulted in AIM trades. Looking at the time periods involved (6 days and 8 days), that's not too surprising. Interesting discussion about frequency and amplitude. Regards, Jack