Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aptus who wrote (13043)	10/3/2000 11:33:04 PM
From: LemonHead	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18928

Hi All, I just finished watching the Gore/Bush debate. Really don't think anyone is interested in what I think and I know from past experience it won't make a bit of difference. To me it seams some what ironic that our current economic windfall has the credit taken by the political machine. Just wish they would clear the smoke and tell the truth for what it is. But that will not happen in my life time and maybe never again in the future of the world. But it makes me wonder back to the days of the Trial Lateral Commission Conspiracy talk. If any of you have experienced a tax cut in your life time that has increased the net value of the same dollar from the previous year, then please tell me when. Oh well, is it time to "Pump the AIM Breaks"? Keith@com.

To: aptus who wrote (13043)	10/4/2000 9:33:47 AM
From: Jack Jagernauth	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18928

Hi Mark, I am sorry, at this time, I am not sure of the value of the 0 - 1000 relative measure as a tool for determining AIM-ability. The reason I say that is, I compared the numbers generated for two stocks I own (GAC.TO and CTRA.TO) and the numbers don't make sense, based on what I already know about these two stocks. After thinking about it some more, I feel that the other method I used for determining AIM-ability provides a more realistic view of things. Why not run simulations in PCA, or your software, and see how many trades the stock generates per year using standard AIM parameters? To me, that is a more pragmatic way to determine AIM-ability. Regards, Jack