Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (1209)	10/5/2000 12:38:26 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

Message 14517349

To: Rarebird who wrote (1209)	10/5/2000 3:29:23 PM
From: long-gone	Respond to of 10042

CLINTON-GORE ADMINISTRATION ORDERED BY COURT TO TURN OVER DOCUMENTS IN PORTALS SCANDAL CASE Crime/Corruption Announcement Keywords: JUDICIAL WATCH Source: Judicial Watch Published: October 5, 2000 Posted on 10/05/2000 10:14:52 PDT by GOVscrewsU FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 5, 2000 Contact: Tom Fitton (202) 646-5172 CLINTON-GORE ADMINISTRATION ORDERED BY COURT TO TURN OVER DOCUMENTS IN PORTALS SCANDAL CASE Clinton Appointee Rules Against Administration on Document Request Related to Gore Scandal Portals Real Estate Project Benefitted Gore Fundraisers, Hurt Taxpayers (Washington, DC) The Honorable Ricardo M. Urbina, U.S. District Court Judge, ruled last week that the Clinton-Gore Administration must waive fees and turn over to Judicial Watch documents relating to a controversial government leasing arrangement that benefitted individuals close to Al Gore. In response to a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on the Portals leasing controversy, the General Services Administration had sought to make Judicial Watch pay for thousands of documents before turning them over and sought to summarily dismiss a FOIA lawsuit Judicial Watch brought to obtain the documents. Judge Urbina ruled in favor of Judicial Watch. Publically available evidence suggests that Gore confidants benefitted, at the expense of taxpayers, from million dollar contingency fees in a lease deal between the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Portals Washington, DC office project, which is run by another Gore supporter. Without expressing any opinion on the underlying merits of the allegations, Judge Urbina ruled on September 25, 2000, that, among other things: ...the court agrees that the (Judicial Watch) FOIA request...implicates important public interests. To begin with, federal taxpayers paid for the FCC's lease of the vacant Portals office space, which gives the public a direct and tangible interest in information bearing on the lease and the events surrounding it. Specifically, the public has an interest in information which could help them decide whether an agency's expenditure of their tax monies was based on sound financial or functional considerations or on other, arguably less appropriate considerations...Closely related is the fundamental public interest in information bearing on the alleged possibility that the Vice President and others violated legal or ethical standards in connection with the FCC-Portals lease. Neither of these interests is peculiar to the plaintiffs or their supporters. (emphasis added) "The decision by Judge Urbina is a significant victory for not only Judicial Watch, but for the American taxpayer. We are hopeful we can get to the heart of a scandal that some estimate cost the U.S. taxpayer tens of millions of dollars in unneeded costs - all, allegedly, to benefit a small group of Gore cronies," stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. Judicial Watch, Inc. is a public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption. freerepublic.com

To: Rarebird who wrote (1209)	10/6/2000 7:24:05 AM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

OT(?) Not all Republicans are free from corruption either: Yes, I here-by call (& in emails to Congress)for FAR GREATER punishments for ALL corrupt elected officials - DAMN-IT this trash makes me angry! Oct 5, 2000 - 12:00 PM Ethics Committee Finds Shuster Violated Rules By Larry Margasak Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON (AP) - The House ethics committee said Thursday it has sanctioned Transportation Committee Chairman Bud Shuster, R-Pa., for "serious official misconduct" for accepting improper gifts and favoring a lobbyist but spared him further penalty. The letter of disapproval was negotiated by Shuster and concludes a three-year investigation surrounding one of Congress' most influential members. Shuster's committee controls highway and transportation projects for the nation, giving him tremendous clout among all House members. "By your actions you have brought discredit to the House of Representatives," the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct wrote Shuster. No action will be required by the House as a result of the negotiated settlement, the ethics committee said in announcing its unanimous decision. Shuster called the committee findings and its critical language "overkill" and contended he "complied with the law and with his understanding of what was right."(cont) ap.tbo.com