Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paunch13 who wrote (35098)	10/5/2000 10:50:50 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Paunch, <<some other agenda>> IMO it's just his ego, a calling to right the worlds wrongs. Too bad, he doesn't even begin to have the tools required. LOL I think that IPM could have been successful if management was more concerned about shareholder interests rather than their own. Runyon told me a number of times that IPM had good property. However, even when Dale offered to help with the technology, IPM said they wanted to do their own thing. Well, they did and they died. Maybe the new owner of IPM's property will approach the desert dirt minineralization with a more open mind. Somehow the desert dirts need a demonstration of potential and then the new desert dirt gold rush can continue. I'm still hopeful holding my MXAM that we will see such a day.