Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: P.M.Freedman who wrote (44680)	10/9/2000 8:07:29 PM
From: David E. Taylor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45548

P.M.: From my own research on QCOM and competing technologies over the last few months and everything I've read, the article you posted sounded like so much BS that I posted a question about it on the QCOM thread: Message 14542435 You should read the various responses to that post that I received before you place too much reliance on IDCC and the report by Dr. Bill Dalglish, CFP. According to one PM response I received, Dalglish claimed several years ago that CDMA would never work, and according to another PM, IDCC is just a bunch of lawyers (no engineers, no IPR on CDMA) who QCOM paid $5 million or so several years ago to go away and stop being a nuisance. From my own work, I believe QCOM has a lock on any implementation of CDMA anywhere, and revenues will grow rapidly as various flavors of CDMA are rolled out to support 3G wireless at the kinds of rates necessary to support next generation services to cell phones, PDA's and other wireless devices. David T.