SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Green who wrote (56895)10/7/2000 12:11:22 AM
From: Don Green  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Weak PC demand could hurt DRAM sales
By Bolaji Ojo and An drew MacLellan, Electronic Buyers' News
Oct 6, 2000 (2:57 PM)
URL: ebnews.com

Hold onto your hefty $727 million fiscal 2000 fourth-quarter profits, Micron Technology Inc. The latest weather report is in for the DRAM and PC markets and the outlook is “murky,” “troubled,” and “cautionary,” with an outside chance of sunshine, according to industry analysts. For the DRAM market and especially Micron, Samsung, and Hyundai, which together account for about 70% of the global market, this dire prognosis could spell trouble for the next few quarters even if it proves only half true.

Behind the pessimism gripping the industry is a weak PC market; slowing corporate as well as consumer PC purchases in Europe; and persistent concern that the traditionally strong end-of-year sales in North America may flop just like the back-to-school season did in September.

“There are serious concerns for DRAM suppliers moving ahead, and a lot will depend on whether PC demand recovers before Christmas,” said Jamie Stitt, director of business development, DRAM products, at the semiconductor group of Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc., Irvine, Calif. “There was an artificially rosy picture for DRAM heading into the fourth quarter, and now during the last few weeks we've been seeing downward pressure as the PC market slows down.”

Only a few months ago, the DRAM market appeared headed for a solid second half in 2000. Forecasters spoke of shortages, firming prices, and higher capital expenditures as suppliers prepared to meet 2001 demand.

Only a third of that dream is alive today despite Micron's outstanding results reported this week. The Boise, Idaho, company ended its fiscal fourth quarter with net income of $727 million, or $1.20 a share, vs. a loss of $17.4 million, or 3 cents a share, in the comparable 1999 period. Revenue rose to $2.6 billion during the quarter ended Aug. 31, from $1.1 billion in the year-ago quarter, lifted by its semiconductor operation, which nearly tripled to $2.3 billion from $820 million. “We are very proud of our execution,” said Steve Appleton, president and chief executive of Micron. “This was a strong quarter and an exceptional year for Micron Technology.” So, why did Micron's stock price fall 13% on Thursday to $41, and 58% below the 52-week high of $97.50? Micron stock was hit by a storm the company couldn't control, analysts said. The bad weather first emerged in September when Intel Corp., Santa Clara, Calif., warned its third-quarter revenue would not meet expectations because of lower PC sales in Europe. Subsequent similar announcements by Apple Computer Inc. and Dell Computer Corp. have painted a bleak picture of sliding demand for computers, analysts said. “Although the DRAM supply picture looks reasonable given that higher PC OEM inventory levels have been burning off for about the last six weeks, ... the demand picture is more murky in light of Apple's, Dell's, and Intel's pre-announcements,” said Eric Rothdeutsch, an analyst at Robertson Stephens Inc., San Francisco.

Industry executives and analysts said the DRAM market got squeezed in the big letdown of lower-than-anticipated back-to-school sales after padding inventories. “Some of the presumed strength in the quarter [was] actually a result of buildup of DRAM inventory in anticipation of a supply shortfall,” said Michael Sadler, vice president of sales and marketing at Micron. “The back-to-school demand, while significant, did not meet some lofty expectations and, as a result, we observed some select inventory liquidation in the broker channel.”

At Infineon Technologies AG, Jan Du Preez, president of the German company's North American operation, acknowledged the industry faced pricing pressures arising from supply and demand imbalance, although he predicts the industry will expand about 17% in 2001.

But that conservative growth estimate is proving too optimistic for some industry executives. Toshiba's Stitt, whose company shifted from the price-sensitive low-end PC segment into the high-end server and PC market two years ago, is concerned the upswing Du Preez expects may not materialize.

According to Stitt, the consumer-PC market was hit by softening demand, at least in part because of the lack of compelling new features that have attracted back-to-school buyers in years past.

At the same time, a lack of new software and a lukewarm market reception to the Windows 2000 operating system triggered little consumer or corporate demand for memory-enriched PCs. The net result was a roughly 25% reduction in average Mbytes shipped in PCs from the second to the third quarter, Stitt said.

What happened since June is history. The more important question now is: where is the DRAM market headed in 2001? This will likely be determined by the PC sector, which the IDC, Framingham, Mass., forecasts will grow 19% in 2000 before sliding to 17% in 2001. The fate of the PC market is unclear, however.

While Boston-based SG Cowen Securities Corp.'s Richard Chu said he sees continued softness in Europe and the small-company markets, Micron's Sadler said his company is looking for a boost in the holiday season as the high DRAM inventory level falls to a “comfortable level in broker and OEM channels.” To emphasize its confidence in the DRAM market, Micron said it will increase its fiscal 2001 capital spending by 64%, to $2.3 billion from $1.4 billion in 2000. The company plans to keep investing in double-data-rate DRAM, which it sees as a successor to PC100 and PC133 in graphics and most memory applications.

“Beyond this, we don't see any other alternative technology gaining traction in the marketplace,” Sadler said.



To: Don Green who wrote (56895)10/7/2000 3:13:54 AM
From: NightOwl  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Hi Don G.,

I see the plot is getting quite thick. It hasn't quite "set" as yet, but its clearly going to take one hell of a shovel to stir it. :8)

What with the Big Bad Bear making life miserable for all but the shortest shorts, this thread is about the only place a bird can go to find a good laugh. ...Not that everyone visits for the <g>'s.

But then I think I can say without much fear of contradiction that "ptnewell" is going to log some hefty posting over this one, regardless of motivation.

This is not a good sign for the RMBS legal staff. First they are before the ITC - now they aren't. Very very bad move indeed. Their B+ has just been revised downward to D+. And heaven help them if they don't get a Slam Bam Thank You Mam trial in Europe. ...Whatever will "Edselstone" think? ...And when he tells Tate that he is indeed thinking "whatever", what will be the explanation given? <vbg>

Any budding Judge Judy's out there want to take a stab at guessing just exactly "why" RMBS has employed the old Castanza "Stop Short" move?

And Carl mark this post well:
Message 14447824

I'm staking my claim to first "sillycon" on the attribution of the "Dead, Dead, Dead" to RMBS the stock symbol. You may have the rights to all the "DDoDDRN" IP, but you will have to share royalties with us M&P's.



To: Don Green who wrote (56895)10/7/2000 7:29:16 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Don,

What is wrong with this company? Their strategy of going for the jugular of their customers seems suicidal to me.

If Rambus would have dropped their SDRAM claims, and asked for reasonable royalties on DDR, perhaps they could salvaged something. It seems kind of late to save any credibility at this point.

Scumbria



To: Don Green who wrote (56895)10/7/2000 8:07:21 AM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 93625
 
Don,

In a strange turn of events, Rambus said late today it had filed a motion to dismiss its pending U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) complaint against Hyundai, on the same day ITC officials came forward to say they were ready to go ahead with an investigation.

I'll bet people over at the ITC really enjoy getting jerked around like this.

Scumbria



To: Don Green who wrote (56895)10/7/2000 12:05:29 PM
From: richard surckla  Respond to of 93625
 
Don... Rambus should just hire the YAKUZA to solve the problem!<G> eom