Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JHP who wrote (25723)	10/8/2000 1:09:02 PM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (8) \| Respond to of 436258

JHP: Like Mr. Murphy, I'm a tech analyst. Unlike him, I've been a bear for more than two years with respect to the "tech sector" (at least as it relates to the PC/semi/telecom stocks). I do not share his conviction that the tech stocks are "the best place for you to invest your hard-earned money in the months and years ahead". In fact, I see continued exposure to the "tech sector" as an invitation to a disaster, particularly given the insane valuations found (at least until this last few weeks) across the sector. I think that I have spotted one of the reasons why we see the sector differently. Our research methods differ. In Mr. Murphy's case, I note a reliance on the views of company officers and various industry-related organizations. At this end, our concern is with what is actually going on across the whole distribution chain (i.e., from the producing company through distributors to consumer), as well as with the views of engineers within the companies that are of investment interest to us (who experience has taught are much more knowledgeable and dare we say it, more "accurate" in their views than are company officers). My research suggests precisely the opposite to Mr. Murphy's view. Having criss-crossed the U.S. (from coast to coast) this summer, I can state unequivocally that the PC sales environment is the worst I have ever witnessed. One word sums it up,.... saturation,.... and that saturation extends right across the distribution channel. Of course, the fact that corporations (which as we both know, historically soak up close to 2/3rds of all PC purchases) essentially ceased PC purchasing last September, has much to do with this. (witness the several abrupt bankruptcies of major resellers this year), but even within the consumer sales arena, demand is soggy. Inventories rarely tell lies and they are huge. Every bit as worrisome to me is that fact that things are not much better in Telecom land. How many new customers still exist to purchase the output of massively expanded cell phone production? And what are we to make of the fact that telecom equipment producers have been forced by the brutally competitive nature of their game to become "financial houses", financing not only the purchases of their clients but also the installation costs of same? In an era where the prices of all services within the telecom sector are in free fall (price wars), it is far from a certainty that payment will eventually be made for all this grand infrastructure "build-out". Several years ago, I commenced building a file of the utterances of the various "tech sector" research organizations. I did this because the level of accuracy of their predictions was,....... ah,.... inevitably "optimistic" (to be kind), usually to the point of being embarrassing in the follow-on period. I haven't noted any change in this pattern of late It is also a fact that the balance sheets as well as the accounting practices of many tech sector participants have deteriorated to the point where some are now perilously close to "the line". While a rhetorical question, one can't help but wonder what might be Mr. Murphy's reply as to why this has occurred if things are in such delightful shape. Best, Earlie

To: JHP who wrote (25723)	10/8/2000 2:21:53 PM
From: kha vu	Respond to of 436258

monday outlook: <<<A bit of reality news; Friday just past 11:00am EST a major player bought 3,000+ OEX Oct 750 puts for 10 points each. He or she didn't try to wish the market, they just plunked down over $3 million in the direction it wanted to go. Well before the close these contracts traded at 13 for a cool $900,000+ increase to the trade. To our knowledge it remains open.>>>>>>>

To: JHP who wrote (25723)	10/8/2000 10:35:55 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

<This thread better wake up<G> By: Michael Murphy.... > Anyone know how this guy has been on his "big" calls?? I know he sold INCY in his portfolio for some lame as* reason @ $20 right before it ran to $300!!! I also know he took money off the table in Semi-equip WAY early a year and 1/2 or so ago... can't remember. Does he have any credibility for the larger picture? DAK