Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (37995)	10/10/2000 10:34:55 AM
From: FiloF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

OT Brian: Wow. Talk about naive. Your defense of Bush's intelligence rests primarily on the fact that he went to Yale and Harvard. I am not taking a stand here as to whether he is intelligent or not, but his attendance at Ivy League schools means nothing. I know many graduates from Ivy League and other top schools who are, in my opinion, of marginal intelligence. There are many way to get into these schools, and it is not always based on merit. (Again, I am not getting into the argument of whether Bush was admitted based on merit or otherwise.) Aplogies to the thread for continuing the off-topic stuff...

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (37995)	10/10/2000 1:13:05 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 70976

"After your statements, I am now wondering about your "intellectual ability," no offense intended. Because Cary said Bush was an intellectual lightweight you come with the insults, much like you did when I equated tobacco with poison. You owe Cary an apology. It really is a sign of immaturity on your part to maliciously attack folks who have differences of opinions with you. I am sure Cary was blindsided by your response just as I was several months ago.