Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (125663)	10/10/2000 3:02:14 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570269

Have you considered that some of those things that you see as bad for the country might be considered good by George Bush. Tim, I don't see how supporting the interests of a special group like big oil or tobacco can be good for the entire country. Nonetheless, its true I don't have the whole picture nor the view that Bush has. ted

To: TimF who wrote (125663)	10/10/2000 4:05:26 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 1570269

TW, RE:"I think one of the better things Bush did was his selection of Cheney as a running mate. I was very impressed by him in the debate, and I am rarely impressed by politicians. I'd probably rather see Cheney as president then Bush. (and I would definitely rather see Leiberman as president then Gore.)" --- The media clearly set out to smear Cheney early and cubbie hole him as "rich old guard". First thing out out their mouths was the Mandela thing. After that the figured they had him holed and basically ignored him. It's not until they were literally forced to give him air time via debate did we see just how intelligent a man he is and like you said, a good choice by Bush. It should be very evident how the liberal press is orchestrating the election. Sure, some try to be unbiased but the bias shows through regardless. Some are more blatant about it. Jim