SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Puck who wrote (7513)10/11/2000 7:40:52 PM
From: mightylakers  Respond to of 34857
 
I would suggest that the Qualcomm true believers on this board consider why these companies have not embraced CDMA2000 against the wishes of their paternalistic government.

What do you mean they are not embracing CDMA2000?

Here're my thoughts I posted on you-know-where.

Message 14553860



To: Puck who wrote (7513)10/11/2000 10:04:13 PM
From: Caxton Rhodes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Puck- As a long term Q holder, this is the sort of FUD that Q has put up for 10 years. People know they have the best technology and either want lower royalty rates or a piece of the pie. As I keep repeating: If you belive this graph:

qualcomm.com

Then 1XeV is the way to go, damn q's royalties, damn the world politics. Its about cheaper faster wireless service because that is what will make the carriers the most money.

Caxton


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News