Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rudedog who wrote (113271)	10/12/2000 11:12:19 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

rudedog, what, perchance, is indicative of "incorrectly considering micro effects as indicative of macro trends." in the data show in www2.ios.com Looks like a pretty smooth slope up to me. What I follow of the global warming debate seems like the debate on evolution. The debunkers have a lot of criticism but not a lot of alternative explanations. The preferred current line seems to be handwaving about "natural causes". I can point you to a petition you can sign if you want to be counted as a "scientist" the next time the WSJ "debunks" global warming, though. oism.org

To: rudedog who wrote (113271)	10/12/2000 12:27:00 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 186894

OT - Thank-you rudedog for the information of how the situation looks when one searchs for scientific truth rather than just data to justify an agenda.