Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (1629)	10/12/2000 2:12:40 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

Cos, all your marbles seem to be on a roll today! Good stuff!

To: cosmicforce who wrote (1629)	10/12/2000 2:38:41 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

It's magic?? That is really your answer? Sounds like the guy in Shakespear in Love who, not having an answer,just said "it's a mystery, no one can know it" I thought we were supposed to be logical on this thread? That is not an answer. If personality is not personal and morality is not moral then logically your not being logical. You seem to want to take your ball and go home. Stay and play. But do it within the rules. Logic please. Greg

To: cosmicforce who wrote (1629)	10/12/2000 4:21:27 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

I'm sorry I still don't see that as being an answer. If you reduce everything to particles, or atoms or balls for that matter then there is ultimately, no room for personality. Yet it is you, that mentioned Decart's "I think therefore I am" Taking a mystical leap from there does not solve that problem for you it just ignores it. Either you really exist as a person or you do not. If you exist, how do you explain your personal existence? If you do not exist, then who the heck am I talking to? Have a relatively, meaningless, purposeless, day.:) Greg