SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rande Is who wrote (38371)10/13/2000 5:27:43 PM
From: carepedeum2000  Respond to of 57584
 
rande- do you know the words to the song "WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DAY MAKES"
have a nice weekend!!
ps i would love it, but i still dont think they are going to let us back off the mat this easy, there are going to be some more battles this month, how far you think short covering can carry us? my cue is the price of oil, it goes down, buy, it goes up, duck



To: Rande Is who wrote (38371)10/13/2000 6:46:55 PM
From: Joe Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57584
 
Rande--
Thanks for the LT port. I think that I will get a chance to set up a port with those stocks over the weekend for everyone's reference. Had a great day today. Up about 10%, but nowhere near making back what I lost over the last two weeks. I am surprised that you have. Which brings to mind a trend that disturbs me here during this bearish season. I think a lot of it started with the Softechie disturbance which I never understood. His tone was annoying but his call was great. Speaking of annoying tones, here is what disturbs me.

I will call it the case of posting bad calls and good news. And I am speaking directly to you my esteemed Rande Is. Never in the year that I have been here have you been so bamboozled by the market, IMO. I do not hold this against you or blame you for my own premature move from short to long. Nonetheless, there is a disturbing trend that has gone along with this struggle you and all of us have had. You post calls that are absolutely contrary to the market and then later post the after-the-fact good news that you changed your mind and everything worked out well. But, the good call when you changed your mind is never posted. Fortunately the last few days I have actually treated you as a contrarian indicator. ( Something I expect to probably never do again.) Thus, when you were on the brink of the abyss this morning I added. When you were taking profits at 12:30, I added. I figure that somehow, the shorts have figured out exactly how to attack your mindset.

In any case, I should make a couple of examples of bad calls and good news. Today, at 2:00, you posted that you were taking profits and would add later on a pullback. The market went straight up. At the EOD, you posted that you "ended up buying back everything I sold as they approached my sell prices." Yet, you did not post this great call. And not to quibble, but which stock exactly pulled back this afternoon, letting you reeenter near the sell prices.

Another example I found particularly disturbing was the YHOO posts. After YHOO earnings on 10/10, you posted at 4:49PM that "Chipmakers like VTSS, PMCS & AMCC all down around 10 points in after hours!!. . .Lucent is down 6, if you can imagine. . .25 bucks per share. Unbelievable. Nortel is falling in sympathy.
By contrast, net related stocks are up in sympathy to Yahoo's earnings. CMGI, INKT, EBAY, ICGE, DCLK, etc." Now, you made no call here and I would not speculate on whether you were saying that net stocks were the place to be and chips were not. Clearly it was the other way around. What irks me is that, long after YHOO tumbled in after hours, you posted that you dumped YHOO at 85 11/16. To get that price you would have had to dump right around that 4:49 post, yet you did not share this great call, only the good news later that you had dumped at 85 11/16.

Now don't sell me short Rande. I have been here a long time and I am very loyal and still believe that you are the best source of investment info on the web. And also be aware that I know that you cannot post every move you make. But, the number of times that I have been reading bad calls and good news is just too many to be coincidental. And I am not accusing you of doing this on purpose. Instead, I am proposing that something about the psychology of the struggle here the last month has prompted this behavior. I find it hard to believe that I am the only one disturbed by it. I am also afraid that people who are new to the site will let it affect your credibility, which I do not because I have been here so long. I just find it very annoying and potentially damaging to the thread. Thank you for letting me vent!

Regards



To: Rande Is who wrote (38371)10/13/2000 7:43:55 PM
From: bob  Respond to of 57584
 
<<With the increased volatility of the year 2000, I have found it
necessary to increase the number of issues within my long term
portfolio. I am concentrating my trading and investing efforts
on these 50 names at this point.>>

I would consider adding CMRC to that list.

GLW and NTAP are high on my list. Glad to see you feel the same.

For old time sake....Still have a boat load of ORCL. Old habits die hard. The stock has made me a bundle.

Best to you and the family. I hope the wife is doing well!?



To: Rande Is who wrote (38371)10/13/2000 10:22:41 PM
From: ThirdEye  Respond to of 57584
 
What, Rande??! Only one "X" stock in the lot(LRCX) What's the market coming to?<<GG>>



To: Rande Is who wrote (38371)10/14/2000 4:04:27 AM
From: oaktownaj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
 
Rande,
When you mentioned DCLK, I thought you were doing one of those - "let them knock down the price a little and then buy" things so I waited and got in low 11's...geez, that's the first time I did something that turned out right...LOL...
We also did a list of web hotels and you spoke highly of one that was around six dollars. I think I know enough by now to buy a $6 stock that Rande likes a lot...
Anyway, I think things are stacked against us here - again, I am looking forward to the new site...AJ



To: Rande Is who wrote (38371)10/14/2000 5:46:43 PM
From: Joe Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57584
 
Put together the port to be shared. Used about $10000 for each position with less for small caps.
siliconinvestor.com



To: Rande Is who wrote (38371)11/2/2000 11:01:50 AM
From: Rande Is  Respond to of 57584
 
I am doing quite some bit of swing trading our Long-Term portfolio today! [See Thread Header on Hybrid Trading]

Now this is the way I like things to be! Holding our Winners List long, position trading those from the list with the clearest change of trend. . . . .and swing trading those which gather momentum. . .occasionally even daytrading the momentum!

That's the way I like it! Uh huh!

Rande Is