SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dale_laroy who wrote (13905)10/14/2000 11:11:43 AM
From: NazbusterRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Intel finally bites the bullet
edtn.com

Intel at last has acknowledged it has big problems in the factory.
Its management shuffle this week was viewed by industry
watchers as a major move to clean up its manufacturing act in advanced
processors.

For two years now, the MPU giant's attempts to rush into production
with new central processors has been plagued with chronic manufacturing
problems. This has delayed shipments, cut revenues, and opened the
door for archrival Advanced Micro Devices to gain ground in the
x86-based microprocessor wars.

Albert Yu, who led Intel's MPU development for 16 years, appears to
be the big loser. He is out as co-general manager of Intel's Architecture
Group. He was moved to a new job [as yet untitled] heading up the
company's optoelectronics activities.

The big winner was Paul Otellini, formerly executive vice president and
co-general manager of the Intel Architecture Group. He was named sole
manager. He will work closely with Mike Splinter, who also was just
promoted to executive vice president of Intel's Technology and
Manufacturing Group, to guarantee the successful ramp of key products.

In their expanded roles, the two execs will oversee the migration of the
Pentium III processor to Intel's new 0.13-micron technology next year
and will try to accelerate the ramp of the upcoming Pentium 4. "Mike
Splinter and Paul Otellini have all the resources under their control
needed to move faster and be more successful in this area," maintains
CEO Craig Barrett.

The move comes at a critical time for Intel in terms of manufacturing. "I
don't think Intel is falling flat on its face," says Tony Massimini, analyst at
Semico Research. "But I think Intel is being pushed by AMD much faster
than [Intel] expected."


Intel's manufacturing woes started in late 1999 when it wasn't able to ship
enough processors to PC manufacturers, causing a shortfall in computer
sales at its largest customers. "There are a number of customers that have
been shorted by Intel over the years," says Joe Osha, analyst for Merrill
Lynch.



To: dale_laroy who wrote (13905)10/14/2000 11:49:58 AM
From: niceguy767Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
dale:

". I think AMD will get hammered by Intel's earnings report and would like to have my purchases at safer price points."

Comment: Given the seeming irrational market response to AMD over the past 3 months,and the past week in particular, nothing will surprise me come next Wednesday, once INTC "facts" have been presented...Seems to me an AMD at $40 would already factor in every conceivable AMD negative...An AMD at $22, it would seem is erroneously factoring in just about any conceivable negatives currently surrounding its competitors...



To: dale_laroy who wrote (13905)10/14/2000 2:43:54 PM
From: f.simonsRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
I think AMD will get hammered by Intel's earnings report and would like to have my purchases at safer price points.

Dale-

Do you mean a good report or a bad report? IMO, a good Intel report might do wonders for both companies. Maybe you should hope for that, like Niceguy is.

Frank