Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (57742)	10/15/2000 3:45:23 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Carl, <He is, however, a bit tied to the official Intel viewpoint, and this colors his opinions on the Rambus issues.> What an attitude. This is coming from a guy who is an admitted FUD-spreader for the anti-Rambus campaign, and who regularly spins the facts and even tells a few lies "just for fun." And I thought it was bad enough when I saw an arrogant guy like Richard Hatch win Survivor. Tenchusatsu

To: Bilow who wrote (57742)	10/15/2000 9:53:11 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Carl, Mr. T the glass house guy is in a somewhat different class than the pure Rambus flacks. He fits in pretty well with all the other Intel employees on SI, though. The arrogance wears thin after Intel's impressive execution during the past year. But I'm sure T remains quite confident in the superiority of Intel's code names. Some of the other Intel employees seem to be a little more on the ball than T, though, as the majority of those on SI seem to have acknowledged that the Rambus connection has hurt Intel. Maybe T has figured that out now, too, maybe not. Your compilation is certainly impressive, though. Maybe T should pick up a VC820 board or 2 as a memento of his past devotion. If he can't pick one up out of the dumpster at work, they can be had on pricewatch for <$50 these days. Cheers, Dan.