SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michaelth1 who wrote (8493)10/16/2000 2:41:12 PM
From: Investartist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10852
 
LOR vs. GMH in earnings.

For every $1000 invested in Loral TODAY, the company will gross about $1098 this year. For every $1000 invested in GMH TODAY the company will gross about $134 this year.

For every $1000 invested in Loral today, the company earned $34 of positive EBIDTA last quarter. For every $1000 invested today in GMH, the company earned $4 of positive EBIDTA last quarter.

I ask you, which company is more likely to be worth 10 times more in share value from today in the next few years?
(Notwithstanding the buyout)

Here's my math. Correct me if any numbers appear to be incorrect:

Loral is very oversold at this time relative to Hughes (GMH). BOTH COMPANIES ARE EBIDTA POSITIVE! Based on the June 2000 EBIDTA and the 12/99 full year revenues consider the following

EBIDTA per share for 6/00 Quarter:

Loral= $0.15 for June Quarter

GMH= $0.127 for June Quarter

Gross Revenues per share based on last 12 months as per MSNMoneyCentral

Loral= $4.78 of gross revenue per share

GMH= $4.17 of gross revenue per share

Price per share as of today

Loral= $4.38 per share

GMH= $31.15 per share

THEREFORE the market is currently paying the following for revenue:

Loral= $4.38 per share for $4.78 gross revenue per share = 0.91 times revenue

GMH =$31.15 per share for $4.17 gross revenue per share = 7.47 times revenue
________________________________________________
Loral EBIDTA =$4.38 per share for a positive $0.15 EBIDTA revenue last quarter= 29.2 times last quarter's EBIDTA

GMH EBIDTA =$31.15 per share for a positive $0.127 EBIDTA revenue last quarter = 245 times last quarter's EBIDTA

HENCE, Loral is highly undervalued relative to GMH. The market is paying over 8 times as much for GMH as Loral for each dollar of gross revenue and each dollar of EBIDTA.

I repeat, Loral is highly undervalued and is a very good investment in my opinion at this time.

Investartist



To: Michaelth1 who wrote (8493)10/16/2000 5:23:41 PM
From: Rocket Scientist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10852
 
From the Q2 Earnings cc, breakdown of capex:

2000 2001
Telstar 10 (APStar) 180
Telstar 8 120 100
Telstar 13 (Echostar) 25 68
Brazil 40 100
Broad band 50 50
Non Sat Capex 90 50

I agree the 250M$ is Satmex' not Loral's, directly. Still,
money (and transponder capacity) is fungible, to some
extent. I assume the Sol 1 failure will result in an
immediate jump in Cap utilization on the rest of the Loral
fleet as well as enable Satmex to place an order for 1-2 new
satellites from SS/L.



To: Michaelth1 who wrote (8493)10/16/2000 8:57:53 PM
From: TMann  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10852
 
Personally I'm glad LOR has not announced partners for 2way BB data inititive via Cyberstar. I can't take another $4B investment modeled after G*. In fact, G* is a testament to how off base Bernie and his mgmt. have been concerning business opportunities in the sat. business.

WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER GLOBALFLOP.