SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (2837)10/17/2000 10:35:41 AM
From: Lino...  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042
 
So you say it's OK to hate classes that haven't been officially certified to be beneficiaries of hate crime legislation? Will groups like gangs, KKK, liberals (because we all know liberals are not capable of hatred, something in their genetic make-up most likely, so they must be targets), etc, be able to apply to a govt agency for certification?



To: epicure who wrote (2837)10/17/2000 10:52:57 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10042
 
Wouldn't it be possible that gangs would fall under "creed" due to the blood oaths and expressions of common beliefs that bind them together?

Thus, members of one gang targeting members of another gang are targeting their "creed"...

Why can't we make gang warfare fall under the term "Hate Crime".. After all, it's pretty clear they hate each other because of who they are...

Is your definition of "hate crime" so narrow that it would not encompass gang violence?



To: epicure who wrote (2837)10/17/2000 12:17:05 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042
 
No- hate crime legislation is based on already established classes-

Exactly. It treats people as members of classes or groups
rather then as individuals.

Tim