Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (126392)	10/18/2000 10:24:09 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1579888

Jeez, Elmer, couldn't you even dig something up on Yahoo, in the Rambus fashion? Paul Excel is hardly a reliable source.

To: Elmer who wrote (126392)	10/18/2000 10:57:05 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579888

Elmer, There is a character on Rambus thread, Jim Kelly. When I asked him to provide a link supporting one of his claims, he provided link to another of his posts claiming the same thing. Well, you are almost there, pointing to Paul's post. Joe

To: Elmer who wrote (126392)	10/18/2000 1:09:04 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579888

I understand the frustration of the AMD group. You've watched Intel ship chipset after chipset that seamlessly supports SMP. In fact the problem over at Intel is how to turn it off??? I type this on my dual processor Celeron system while AMD can't get a similar system working properly after over a year of trying. Elmer, The only thing that may be seamless about Intel right now is its numbers and if that's true, it's not a compliment. After Intel's problems with Merced, the P3, the P4, chipsets and volume control, you dare to criticize AMD. What are they putting in the AZ water nowadays? ted