SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KevinMark who wrote (3062)10/18/2000 1:39:02 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042
 
Anyone who doesn't think there is a huge "puke factor" for both of the candidates (or any candidate in most larger elections) isn't looking too closely.

I agree that Nader is an option for people who would vote Democrat or some fiscal conservatives who don't like the right wing control of the Republicans but still want to send a message. It is a low risk because of the Electoral College - your vote doesn't count anyway for the winner, but it does carry a message. I want whoever wins to have to avoid the word "mandate" or "consensus" in his post-election posturing.



To: KevinMark who wrote (3062)10/18/2000 8:19:38 PM
From: pezz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10042
 
<<Nader is taking votes away from the Democratic party? >>

LOL....no votes have been taken away yet my friend...That's my point..

Last week I heard a radio personality say he saw a banner that read ...."Nader for president" Underneath it said "uneless it's close"

So don't be too cocky with your 1% lead. That extra 5% would swing it to the good guys.