Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColtonGang who wrote (48938)	10/19/2000 6:40:16 AM
From: ecommerceman	Respond to of 769670

George W., Washington Insider By Timothy Noah Posted Wednesday, Oct. 18, 2000, at 11:11 a.m. PT Can we please retire the notion that George W. Bush is the Washington Outsider in this presidential race? In last night's final presidential debate in St. Louis, Bush's chief tactic was to brand everything that Al Gore said as corrupt Washington doublespeak. Indeed, Bush spat out the word "Washington" so many times (16) and with such contempt that Chatterbox wondered whether the live audience assembled at Washington University would start to take offense. Here's a sampler: Now, there's this kind of Washington, D.C., focus, well, it's in this committee or it's got this sponsor. ... [T]here's a lot of bickering in Washington, D.C. It's kind of like a political issue as opposed to a people issue. ... If you're from Washington, you want to pick and choose winners. I don't think that's the role of the president. ... A lot of people are sick and tired of the bitterness in Washington, D.C., and therefore they don't want any part of politics. They look at Washington and see people pointing fingers and casting blame and saying one thing and doing another. ... One thing about insurance, that's a Washington term. ... Bush's "I'm a Washington outsider" stance helps him stir populist resentment and gives him a justification for not knowing the details about any given policy--indeed, on occasion, not even knowing what his own party platform advocates. (Chatterbox's favorite example of the latter occurred during the second debate when Bush, asked whether he supported the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, answered, "Well, I have no idea. I mean, he can throw out all kinds--I don't know the particulars of this law.") But the idea that George W. Bush is free of any Washington taint is ridiculous. Both presidential candidates are named after prominent Washington-politician fathers. For Bush, however, the nepotism factor looms much larger than it does for Gore. Bush's Washington family tree reaches back two generations (to Connecticut Sen. Prescott Bush). Gore's reaches back only one. Bush is the son of a former president and vice president; Gore is the son of a senator. The basis of Bush's fame and political viability, first as a Texas gubernatorial candidate and now as a presidential candidate, is his father's 12 consecutive years in Gomorrah on the Potomac. (You can also make a decent argument that this is the basis of Dubya's late-blooming financial success.) For Gore, Washington roots are more accurately described as the motivating force behind rather than the explanation for his present political position. Let's state this so starkly that even an undecided voter will grasp Chatterbox's point: If George W. Bush's father hadn't been Ronald Reagan's vice president and successor, George W. Bush wouldn't be this year's Republican nominee for president. As Dubya himself pointed out last night, when he first ran for governor in Texas, "a lot of folks didn't think I could win, including, by the way, my mother. ..." Both Bush and Gore's presidential candidacies have their origins in family links to Washington. But Gore has been able to add to the advantage of his birth the additional advantages of knowledge about and experience in government at the national level. Bush, on the other hand, flaunts his lack of Washington knowledge and experience while offering himself up to sentimental Republicans as heir to a Washington dynasty. It will be astonishing if he gets away with this.

To: ColtonGang who wrote (48938)	10/19/2000 8:56:19 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769670

Or: Ben Stein Host of Comedy Central’s Win Ben Stein’s Money (also teaches law at Pepperdine, also acts, also writes columns and books, both amusing and serious) We have now seen that Al Gore is simply not emotionally ready for serious responsibility. He is a bullying, belittling, sarcastic thug. When he sidled over next to George W. Bush in a sort of Saturday Night Live imitation of a barroom power play, I realized that to Al Gore, life is deadly contest. He is so fearful of losing, so paranoid of appearing weak, that he crosses over into thuggery. I respectfully submit that this is not the profile of a man who will obey the laws or respect the Constitution. Al Gore has only one rule: excelsior for Al Gore and oblivion for all who stand in his way. This is a dangerous man. He scares me. George W. Bush continues to grow and to show his calm, well-mannered self. He did not rise to Gore's baiting lies about his tax plan or his smears of Texas. He is a well-educated man, an accomplished man, but most of all here is the bottom line about Bush: He is an honest, decent man. voter.com