Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (1858)	10/19/2000 1:01:28 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Oh please Greg. Give it a rest. I don't say it just "popped into existence". You made that up yourself my dear. But if you say God popped it into existence than WHAT popped God into existence? You've merely restated the problem of a first cause. You are letting your emotions get the better of you not me. I've been logical- while you are spinning around desperately saying quite emotional and illogical things. You seem upset Greg. And I'm sorry you are upset. But don't project your emotional turbulence onto me- because I don't have any. This topic is not upsetting for me- because my faith is not at issue.

To: Greg or e who wrote (1858)	10/19/2000 1:46:00 PM
From: cosmicforce	Respond to of 28931

Complex, efficient designs may support a guiding, optimizing "force", but they don't attest to the truth of YOUR God. Clearly, everyone on the planet who doesn't understand something wants to create a theory to explain it. How else can you explain so many explanations. Clearly they can't all be true. So since at least some are false, and even the ones that claim to be vessels for the same truth disagree, it seems more likely that almost all religions are wrong. Most religions end up rejecting some truths because they conflict with their truth. The only ones that can be right are those that embrace the data.