Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (370)	10/22/2000 2:10:33 PM
From: Ahda	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

If we start this again, the system as stands is set up to facilitate greed. So we go back to the original statement of the system produces evil by being what it is. I shall choose the word dishonest as evil is to me not a fitting word. The system by the very nature of its laws is unfair. It promotes dishonest in all of us who can afford to be dishonest because we have cash flow. As social services promote dishonest the system is rigged to benefit wrong doing. Example is the tax code. We are the makers of the system. He is not immovable he does not judge but states the sum of the whole.

To: GraceZ who wrote (370)	10/22/2000 6:40:56 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

A democracy is about majority rule with minority rights, correct? No. It never quite works out like that does it, It always works out that way. You have to trust in democracy just like you have to trust in free markets. Whatever is gained in one quarter is lost in another. This is what you should have gleaned from American History. We can choose to be less efficient or more poor, or we can choose otherwise. We are free to choose and our representative democracy accomplishes that. because there are frequent instances where minority rights are abridged by the majority as well as instances where powerful minorities have been able to hold sway over what the majority wants. That isn't a valid reason for thinking that it doesn't quite work. For example, I can assure you that we will have a flat 10% tax rate, but that will be in the future. It will occur because it will need to occur. Forces exist which will gradually change the people's thinking about taxation and they'll shut down the war on wealth. Meanwhile I have to pay a lot of money to hurt people. My rights aren't abridged by heavy taxes demanded by the tyranny of the majority. I only say that everyone would benefit by having a lower flat tax. Fear and ignorance is what keeps the inefficient regime in place. Not true, never has been. If that were the case I wouldn't waste my time arguing against an immovable object such as yourself. But you do argue that "a democracy is about majority rule with minority rights and that it never quite works out like that does it, because there are frequent instances where minority rights are abridged by the majority" You are saying that a democracy without that characteristics isn't doable, so you go for the bad. Thus it is true and it has been so.