Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (50680)	10/22/2000 10:13:37 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 769667

<<You just avoided both of my points, that Navy re-enlistment is up adn that Gore is spending more on defence than Bush. Just like your candidate you deflect rather than answer. And admit you're wrong. >>

To: American Spirit who wrote (50680)	10/22/2000 10:19:05 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

<<You just avoided both of my points, that Navy re-enlistment is up adn that Gore is spending more on defence than Bush. Just like your candidate you deflect rather than answer. And admit you're wrong. >> How come we have less ships at sea and where do you get it that Navy re-enlistments are up? URL please. Defence is spelled defense. Gore will spend more on defence and Bush more on defense.

To: American Spirit who wrote (50680)	10/23/2000 9:47:32 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Re-enlistment is up for the first time in several years. Recruitment continues to be a problem even though our force structure has shrunk significantly. Morale is a serious problem. Readiness is a serious problem. Those are the facts. Its not the amount of money which makes a difference. Its leadership and how the money is spent. The Bush plan is superior and Bush is a leader the military will have confidence in. JLA