Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (15693)	10/24/2000 10:19:54 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

You got it reversed, Petz. P4 SpecFP is what looks good, SpecInt for the 1.5ghz P4 looks to be maybe a little better than the late, lamented 1.13ghz cumine. Actually, P4 scores were below what an equivalently clocked P3 would get. SPECint scores were much better than P3, beating an equivalently clocked P3. You can check at jc-news.com , or see my posts on the topic when it first came up at Message 14390463 and up the chain. Of course, all Intel spec numbers tend to overstate things relative to, er, things less dependent on the Intel compiler operation, which is more or less everything but spec. Cheers, Dan.