SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (2467)10/24/2000 9:02:47 PM
From: E  Respond to of 28931
 
Correction: I didn't mean Church Fathers, did I? I meant members of the Church hierarchy.



To: E who wrote (2467)10/24/2000 10:30:27 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 28931
 
One thing I want to make sure you are aware of - this is what Pope John Paul II said this year at Israel's Holocaust Museum:

>>The words of the ancient Psalm, rise from our hearts: "I have become like a broken vessel. I hear the whispering of many -- terror on
every side -- as they scheme together against me, as they plot to take my life. But I trust in you, O Lord: I say, 'you are my God."'
(Psalms 31:13-15)

In this place of memories, the mind and heart and soul feel an extreme need for silence. Silence in which to remember. Silence in which to
try to make some sense of the memories which come flooding back. Silence because there are no words strong enough to deplore the
terrible tragedy of the Shoah.

My own personal memories are of all that happened when the Nazis occupied Poland during the war. I remember my Jewish friends and
neighbors, some of whom perished, while others survived. I have come to Yad Vashem to pay homage to the millions of Jewish people
who, stripped of everything, especially of human dignity, were murdered in the Holocaust. More than half a century has passed, but the
memories remain.

Here, as at Auschwitz and many other places in Europe, we are overcome by the echo of the heart-rending laments of so many. Men,
women and children, cry out to us from the depths of the horror that they knew. How can we fail to heed their cry? No one can forget or
ignore what happened. No one can diminish its scale.

We wish to remember. But we wish to remember for a purpose, namely to ensure that never again will evil prevail, as it did for the
millions of innocent victims of Nazism.

How could man have such utter contempt for man? Because he had reached the point of contempt for God. Only a godless ideology could
plan and carry out the extermination of a whole people.

The honor given to the 'Just Gentiles' by the state of Israel at Yad Vashem for having acted heroically to save Jews, sometimes to the
point of giving their own lives, is a recognition that not even in the darkest hour is every light extinguished. That is why the Psalms and
the entire Bible, though well aware of the human capacity for evil, also proclaims that evil will not have the last word.

Out of the depths of pain and sorrow, the believer's heart cries out: "I trust in you, O Lord: 'I say, you are my God."' (Psalms 31:14)

Jews and Christians share an immense spiritual patrimony, flowing from God's self-revelation. Our religious teachings and our spiritual
experience demand that we overcome evil with good. We remember, but not with any desire for vengeance or as an incentive to hatred.
For us, to remember is to pray for peace and justice, and to commit ourselves to their cause. Only a world at peace, with justice for all,
can avoid repeating the mistakes and terrible crimes of the past.

As bishop of Rome and successor of the Apostle Peter, I assure the Jewish people that the Catholic Church, motivated by the Gospel law
of truth and love, and by no political considerations, is deeply saddened by the hatred, acts of persecution and displays of anti-Semitism
directed against the Jews by Christians at any time and in any place.

The church rejects racism in any form as a denial of the image of the Creator inherent in every human being.

In this place of solemn remembrance, I fervently pray that our sorrow for the tragedy which the Jewish people suffered in the 20th
century will lead to a new relationship between Christians and Jews. Let us build a new future in which there will be no more anti-Jewish
feeling among Christians or anti-Christian feeling among Jews, but rather the mutual respect required of those who adore the one
Creator and Lord, and look to Abraham as our common father in faith.

The world must heed the warning that comes to us from the victims of the Holocaust, and from the testimony of the survivors. Here at
Yad Vashem the memory lives on, and burns itself onto our souls. It makes us cry out: "I hear the whispering of many -- terror on every
side -- but I trust in you, O Lord: I say, 'You are my God."' (Psalms 31:13-15)<<

Pope John Paul II - March 23, 2000

historyplace.com



To: E who wrote (2467)10/24/2000 10:35:35 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Here is something the Vatican issued in 1998:

>>The Catholic Church and the Holocaust

Copyright (c) 1998 First Things 83 (May 1998): 39-43.

On March 16, 1998, the Holy See released a long-awaited statement on
the Church and the Holocaust, "We Remember: A Reflection on the
Shoah." ("Shoah," which in its original Hebrew usage referred to
destruction or ruin, is preferred by some over "Holocaust," which
means burnt offering.) The statement was prepared by the Vatican’s
Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews, whose president is
Edward Idris Cardinal Cassidy. Herewith the text of the statement,
together with a cover letter from Pope John Paul II.

To my venerable brother, Cardinal Edward Idris Cassidy.

On numerous occasions during my pontificate I have recalled with a sense of
deep sorrow the sufferings of the Jewish people during the Second World
War. The crime which has become known as the Shoah remains an indelible
stain on the history of the century that is coming to a close.

As we prepare for the beginning of the third millennium of Christianity, the
Church is aware that the joy of a jubilee is above all the joy that is based on
the forgiveness of sins and reconciliation with God and neighbor. Therefore
she encourages her sons and daughters to purify their hearts, through
repentance of past errors and infidelities. She calls them to place themselves
humbly before the Lord and examine themselves on the responsibility which
they, too, have for the evils of our time.

It is my fervent hope that the document, "We Remember: A Reflection on
the Shoah," which the Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews has
prepared under your direction, will indeed help to heal the wounds of past
misunderstandings and injustices. May it enable memory to play its
necessary part in the process of shaping a future in which the unspeakable
iniquity of the Shoah will never again be possible. May the Lord of history
guide the efforts of Catholics and Jews and all men and women of good will
as they work together for a world of true respect for the life and dignity of
every human being, for all have been created in the image and likeness of
God.

From the Vatican, March 12, 1998

Pope John Paul II

I. The Tragedy of the Shoah and the Duty of Remembrance

The twentieth century is fast coming to a close and a new millennium of the Christian era is
about to dawn. The 2,000th anniversary of the birth of Jesus Christ calls all Christians,
and indeed invites all men and women, to seek to discern in the passage of history the
signs of divine providence at work, as well as the ways in which the image of the Creator
in man has been offended and disfigured.

This reflection concerns one of the main areas in which Catholics can seriously take to
heart the summons which Pope John Paul II has addressed to them in his apostolic letter
Tertio Millennio Adveniente: "It is appropriate that, as the second millennium of
Christianity draws to a close, the Church should become more fully conscious of the
sinfulness of her children, recalling all those times in history when they departed from the
spirit of Christ and his Gospel and, instead of offering to the world the witness of a life
inspired by the values of faith, indulged in ways of thinking and acting which were truly
forms of counterwitness and scandal."1

This century has witnessed an unspeakable tragedy, which can never be forgotten: the
attempt by the Nazi regime to exterminate the Jewish people, with the consequent killing
of millions of Jews. Women and men, old and young, children and infants, for the sole
reason of their Jewish origin, were persecuted and deported. Some were killed
immediately, while others were degraded, ill-treated, tortured, and utterly robbed of their
human dignity, and then murdered. Very few of those who entered the camps survived,
and those who did remained scarred for life. This was the Shoah. It is a major fact of the
history of this century, a fact which still concerns us today.

Before this horrible genocide, which the leaders of nations and Jewish communities
themselves found hard to believe at the very moment when it was mercilessly being put
into effect, no one can remain indifferent, least of all the Church, by reason of her very
close bonds of spiritual kinship with the Jewish people and her remembrance of the
injustices of the past. The Church’s relationship to the Jewish people is unlike the one she
shares with any other religion.2 However, it is not only a question of recalling the past. The
common future of Jews and Christians demands that we remember, for "there is no future
without memory."3 History itself is memoria futuri.

In addressing this reflection to our brothers and sisters of the Catholic Church throughout
the world, we ask all Christians to join us in meditating on the catastrophe which befell the
Jewish people, and on the moral imperative to insure that never again will selfishness and
hatred grow to the point of sowing such suffering and death.4 Most especially, we ask our
Jewish friends, "whose terrible fate has become a symbol of the aberrations of which man
is capable when he turns against God,"5 to hear us with open hearts.

II. What We Must Remember

While bearing their unique witness to the Holy One of Israel and to the Torah, the Jewish
people have suffered much at different times and in many places. But the Shoah was
certainly the worst suffering of all. The inhumanity with which the Jews were persecuted
and massacred during this century is beyond the capacity of words to convey. All this was
done to them for the sole reason that they were Jews.

The very magnitude of the crime raises many questions. Historians, sociologists, political
philosophers, psychologists, and theologians are all trying to learn more about the reality
of the Shoah and its causes. Much scholarly study still remains to be done. But such an
event cannot be fully measured by the ordinary criteria of historical research alone. It calls
for a "moral and religious memory" and, particularly among Christians, a very serious
reflection on what gave rise to it.

The fact that the Shoah took place in Europe, that is, in countries of long-standing
Christian civilization, raises the question of the relation between the Nazi persecution and
the attitudes down the centuries of Christians toward the Jews.

III. Relations Between Jews and Christians

The history of relations between Jews and Christians is a tormented one. His Holiness
Pope John Paul II has recognized this fact in his repeated appeals to Catholics to see
where we stand with regard to our relations with the Jewish people.6 In effect, the balance
of these relations over 2,000 years has been quite negative.7

At the dawn of Christianity, after the crucifixion of Jesus, there arose disputes between the
early Church and the Jewish leaders and people who, in their devotion to the Law, on
occasion violently opposed the preachers of the Gospel and the first Christians. In the
pagan Roman Empire, Jews were legally protected by the privileges granted by the
emperor, and the authorities at first made no distinction between Jewish and Christian
communities. Soon, however, Christians incurred the persecution of the state. Later, when
the emperors themselves converted to Christianity, they at first continued to guarantee
Jewish privileges. But Christian mobs who attacked pagan temples sometimes did the
same to synagogues, not without being influenced by certain interpretations of the New
Testament regarding the Jewish people as a whole. "In the Christian world—I do not say
on the part of the Church as such—erroneous and unjust interpretations of the New
Testament regarding the Jewish people and their alleged culpability have circulated for too
long, engendering feelings of hostility toward this people."8 Such interpretations of the
New Testament have been totally and definitively rejected by the Second Vatican
Council.9

Despite the Christian preaching of love for all, even for one’s enemies, the prevailing
mentality down the centuries penalized minorities and those who were in any way
"different." Sentiments of anti-Judaism in some Christian quarters, and the gap which
existed between the Church and the Jewish people, led to a generalized discrimination,
which ended at times in expulsions or attempts at forced conversions. In a large part of
the "Christian" world, until the end of the eighteenth century, those who were not Christian
did not always enjoy a fully guaranteed juridical status. Despite that fact, Jews throughout
Christendom held on to their religious traditions and communal customs. They were
therefore looked upon with a certain suspicion and mistrust. In times of crisis such as
famine, war, pestilence, or social tensions, the Jewish minority was sometimes taken as a
scapegoat and became the victim of violence, looting, even massacres.

By the end of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth century, Jews
generally had achieved an equal standing with other citizens in most states and a certain
number of them held influential positions in society. But in that same historical context,
notably in the nineteenth century, a false and exacerbated nationalism took hold. In a
climate of eventful social change, Jews were often accused of exercising an influence
disproportionate to their numbers. Thus there began to spread in varying degrees
throughout most of Europe an anti-Judaism that was essentially more sociological and
political than religious.

At the same time, theories began to appear which denied the unity of the human race,
affirming an original diversity of races. In the twentieth century, National Socialism in
Germany used these ideas as a pseudoscientific basis for a distinction between so-called
Nordic-Aryan races and supposedly inferior races. Furthermore, an extremist form of
nationalism was heightened in Germany by the defeat of 1918 and the demanding
conditions imposed by the victors, with the consequence that many saw in National
Socialism a solution to their country’s problems and cooperated politically with this
movement.

The Church in Germany replied by condemning racism. The condemnation first appeared
in the preaching of some of the clergy, in the public teaching of the Catholic bishops, and
in the writings of lay Catholic journalists. Already in February and March 1931, Cardinal
Bertram of Breslau, Cardinal Faulhaber and the bishops of Bavaria, the bishops of the
Province of Cologne, and those of the Province of Freiburg published pastoral letters
condemning National Socialism, with its idolatry of race and of the state.10 The
well-known Advent sermons of Cardinal Faulhaber in 1933, the very year in which
National Socialism came to power, at which not just Catholics but also Protestants and
Jews were present, clearly expressed rejection of the Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda."11 In
the wake of the Kristallnacht, Bernard Lichtenberg, provost of Berlin Cathedral, offered
public prayers for the Jews. He was later to die at Dachau and has been declared
Blessed.

Pope Pius XI, too, condemned Nazi racism in a solemn way in his encyclical letter Mit
Brennender Sorge,12 which was read in German churches on Passion Sunday 1937, a
step which resulted in attacks and sanctions against members of the clergy. Addressing a
group of Belgian pilgrims on September 6,1938, Pius XI asserted: "Anti-Semitism is
unacceptable. Spiritually, we are all Semites."13 Pius XII, in his very first encyclical,
Summi Pontificatus,14 of October 20, 1939, warned against theories which denied the
unity of the human race and against the deification of the state, all of which he saw as
leading to a real "hour of darkness."15

IV. Nazi Anti-Semitism and the Shoah

Thus we cannot ignore the difference which exists between anti-Semitism, based on
theories contrary to the constant teaching of the Church on the unity of the human race
and on the equal dignity of all races and peoples, and the long-standing sentiments of
mistrust and hostility that we call anti-Judaism, of which, unfortunately, Christians also
have been guilty.

The National Socialist ideology went even further, in the sense that it refused to
acknowledge any transcendent reality as the source of life and the criterion of moral good.
Consequently, a human group, and the state with which it was identified, arrogated to
itself an absolute status and determined to remove the very existence of the Jewish
people, a people called to witness to the one God and the Law of the Covenant. At the
level of theological reflection we cannot ignore the fact that not a few in the Nazi party not
only showed aversion to the idea of divine providence at work in human affairs, but gave
proof of a definite hatred directed at God himself. Logically, such an attitude also led to a
rejection of Christianity, and a desire to see the Church destroyed or at least subjected to
the interests of the Nazi state.

It was this extreme ideology which became the basis of the measures taken, first to drive
the Jews from their homes and then to exterminate them. The Shoah was the work of a
thoroughly modern neo-pagan regime. Its anti-Semitism had its roots outside of
Christianity and, in pursuing its aims, it did not hesitate to oppose the Church and
persecute her members also.

But it may be asked whether the Nazi persecution of the Jews was not made easier by the
anti-Jewish prejudices imbedded in some Christian minds and hearts. Did anti-Jewish
sentiment among Christians make them less sensitive, or even indifferent, to the
persecution launched against the Jews by National Socialism when it reached power?

Any response to this question must take into account that we are dealing with the history
of people’s attitudes and ways of thinking, subject to multiple influences. Moreover, many
people were altogether unaware of the "final solution" that was being put into effect against
a whole people; others were afraid for themselves and those near to them; some took
advantage of the situation; and still others were moved by envy. A response would need
to be given case by case. To do this, however, it is necessary to know what precisely
motivated people in a particular situation.

At first the leaders of the Third Reich sought to expel the Jews. Unfortunately, the
governments of some Western countries of Christian tradition, including some in North
and South America, were more than hesitant to open their borders to the persecuted
Jews. Although they could not foresee how far the Nazi hierarchs would go in their
criminal intentions, the leaders of those nations were aware of the hardships and dangers
to which Jews living in the territories of the Third Reich were exposed. The closing of
borders to Jewish emigration in those circumstances, whether due to any anti-Jewish
hostility or suspicion, political cowardice or shortsightedness, or national selfishness, lays a
heavy burden of conscience on the authorities in question.

In the lands where the Nazis undertook mass deportations, the brutality which surrounded
these forced movements of helpless people should have led [observers] to suspect the
worst. Did Christians give every possible assistance to those being persecuted, and in
particular to the persecuted Jews?

Many did, but others did not. Those who did help to save Jewish lives as much as was in
their power, even to the point of placing their own lives in danger, must not be forgotten.
During and after the war, Jewish communities and Jewish leaders expressed their thanks
for all that had been done for them, including what Pope Pius XII did personally or
through his representatives to save hundreds of thousands of Jewish lives.16 Many
Catholic bishops, priests, religious, and laity have been honored for this reason by the
state of Israel.

Nevertheless, as Pope John Paul II has recognized, alongside such courageous men and
women, the spiritual resistance and concrete action of other Christians was not that which
might have been expected from Christ’s followers. We cannot know how many Christians
in countries occupied or ruled by the Nazi powers or their allies were horrified at the
disappearance of their Jewish neighbors and yet were not strong enough to raise their
voices in protest. For Christians, this heavy burden of conscience of their brothers and
sisters during the Second World War must be a call to penitence.17

We deeply regret the errors and failures of those sons and daughters of the Church. We
make our own what is said in the Second Vatican Council’s declaration Nostra Aetate,
which unequivocally affirms: "The Church . . . mindful of her common patrimony with the
Jews, and motivated by the Gospel’s spiritual love and by no political considerations,
deplores the hatred, persecutions, and displays of anti-Semitism directed against the Jews
at any time and from any source."18

We recall and abide by what Pope John Paul II, addressing the leaders of the Jewish
community in Strasbourg in 1988, stated: "I repeat again with you the strongest
condemnation of anti-Semitism and racism, which are opposed to the principles of
Christianity."19 The Catholic Church therefore repudiates every persecution against a
people or human group anywhere, at any time. She absolutely condemns all forms of
genocide, as well as the racist ideologies that give rise to them. Looking back over this
century, we are deeply saddened by the violence that has enveloped whole groups of
peoples and nations. We recall in particular the massacre of the Armenians, the countless
victims in Ukraine in the 1930s, the genocide of the Gypsies, which was also the result of
racist ideas, and similar tragedies which have occurred in America, Africa, and the
Balkans. Nor do we forget the millions of victims of totalitarian ideology in the Soviet
Union, in China, Cambodia, and elsewhere. Nor can we forget the drama of the Middle
East, the elements of which are well known. Even as we make this reflection, "many
human beings are still their brothers’ victims."20

V. Looking Together to a Common Future

Looking to the future of relations between Jews and Christians, in the first place we
appeal to our Catholic brothers and sisters to renew the awareness of the Hebrew roots
of their faith. We ask them to keep in mind that Jesus was a descendant of David; that the
Virgin Mary and the Apostles belonged to the Jewish people; that the Church draws
sustenance from the root of that good olive tree onto which have been grafted the wild
olive branches of the Gentiles (cf. Romans 11:17-24); that the Jews are our dearly
beloved brothers, indeed in a certain sense they are "our elder brothers."21

At the end of this millennium the Catholic Church desires to express her deep sorrow for
the failures of her sons and daughters in every age. This is an act of repentance (teshuva),
since, as members of the Church, we are linked to the sins as well as the merits of all her
children. The Church approaches with deep respect and great compassion the experience
of extermination, the Shoah, suffered by the Jewish people during World War II. It is not
a matter of mere words, but indeed of binding commitment. "We would risk causing the
victims of the most atrocious deaths to die again if we do not have an ardent desire for
justice, if we do not commit ourselves to insure that evil does not prevail over good as it
did for millions of children of the Jewish people. . . . Humanity cannot permit all that to
happen again."22

We pray that our sorrow for the tragedy which the Jewish people has suffered in our
century will lead to a new relationship with the Jewish people. We wish to turn awareness
of past sins into a firm resolve to build a new future in which there will be no more
anti-Judaism among Christians or anti-Christian sentiment among Jews, but rather a
shared mutual respect, as befits those who adore the one Creator and Lord and have a
common father in faith, Abraham.

Finally, we invite all men and women of good will to reflect deeply on the significance of
the Shoah. The victims from their graves, and the survivors through the vivid testimony of
what they have suffered, have become a loud voice calling the attention of all of humanity.
To remember this terrible experience is to become fully conscious of the salutary warning
it entails: the spoiled seeds of anti-Judaism and anti-Semitism must never again be allowed
to take root in any human heart.<<

firstthings.com



To: E who wrote (2467)10/24/2000 10:46:21 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 28931
 
This is what Pope Pius XI had to say about, inter alia, the Concordat - Part I, it's too long to fit. It was issued in German and read in all the German Churches.

MIT BRENNENDER SORGE

ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XI ON THE CHURCH AND THE GERMAN REICH
MARCH 14, 1937

To the Venerable Brethren the Archbishops and Bishops of Germany and
other Ordinaries in Peace and Communion with the Apostolic See.

Venerable Brethren, Greetings, and Apostolic Blessing.

It is with deep anxiety and growing surprise that We have long been
following the painful trials of the Church and the increasing vexations
which afflict those who have remained loyal in heart and action in the
midst of a people that once received from St. Boniface the bright message
and the Gospel of Christ and God's Kingdom.

2. And what the representatives of the venerable episcopate, who visited
Us in Our sick room, had to tell Us, in truth and duty bound, has not
modified Our feelings. To consoling and edifying information on the stand
the Faithful are making for their Faith, they considered themselves
bound, in spite of efforts to judge with moderation and in spite of their
own patriotic love, to add reports of things hard and unpleasant. After
hearing their account, We could, in grateful acknowledgment to God,
exclaim with the Apostle of love: "I have no greater grace than this, to
hear that my children walk in truth" (John iii. 4). But the frankness
indifferent in Our Apostolic charge and the determination to place before
the Christian world the truth in all its reality, prompt Us to add: "Our
pastoral heart knows no deeper pain, no disappointment more bitter, than
to learn that many are straying from the path of truth."

3. When, in 1933, We consented, Venerable Brethren, to open negotiations
for a concordat, which the Reich Government proposed on the basis of a
scheme of several years' standing; and when, to your unanimous
satisfaction, We concluded the negotiations by a solemn treaty, We were
prompted by the desire, as it behooved Us, to secure for Germany the
freedom of the Church's beneficent mission and the salvation of the souls
in her care, as well as by the sincere wish to render the German people a
service essential for its peaceful development and prosperity. Hence,
despite many and grave misgivings, We then decided not to withhold Our
consent for We wished to spare the Faithful of Germany, as far as it was
humanly possible, the trials and difficulties they would have had to
face, given the circumstances, had the negotiations fallen through. It
was by acts that We wished to make it plain, Christ's interests being Our
sole object, that the pacific and maternal hand of the Church would be
extended to anyone who did not actually refuse it.

4. If, then, the tree of peace, which we planted on German soil with the
purest intention, has not brought forth the fruit, which in the interest
of your people, We had fondly hoped, no one in the world who has eyes to
see and ears to hear will be able to lay the blame on the Church and on
her Head. The experiences of these last years have fixed responsibilities
and laid bare intrigues, which from the outset only aimed at a war of
extermination. In the furrows, where We tried to sow the seed of a
sincere peace, other men--the "enemy" of Holy Scripture--oversowed the
cockle of distrust, unrest, hatred, defamation, of a determined hostility
overt or veiled, fed from many sources and wielding many tools, against
Christ and His Church. They, and they alone with their accomplices,
silent or vociferous, are today responsible, should the storm of
religious war, instead of the rainbow of peace, blacken the German skies.

5. We have never ceased, Venerable Brethren, to represent to the
responsible rulers of your country's destiny, the consequences which
would inevitably follow the protection and even the favor, extended to
such a policy. We have done everything in Our power to defend the sacred
pledge of the given word of honor against theories and practices, which
it officially endorsed, would wreck every faith in treaties and make
every signature worthless. Should the day ever come to place before the
world the account of Our efforts, every honest mind will see on which
side are to be found the promoters of peace, and on which side its
disturbers. Whoever had left in his soul an atom of love for truth, and
in his heart a shadow of a sense of justice, must admit that, in the
course of these anxious and trying years following upon the conclusion of
the concordat, every one of Our words, every one of Our acts, has been
inspired by the binding law of treaties. At the same time, anyone must
acknowledge, not without surprise and reprobation, how the other
contracting party emasculated the terms of the treaty, distorted their
meaning, and eventually considered its more or less official violation as
a normal policy. The moderation We showed in spite of all this was not
inspired by motives of worldly interest, still less by unwarranted
weakness, but merely by Our anxiety not to draw out the wheat with the
cockle; not to pronounce open judgment, before the public was ready to
see its force; not to impeach other people's honesty, before the evidence
of events should have torn the mask off the systematic hostility leveled
at the Church. Even now that a campaign against the confessional schools,
which are guaranteed by the concordat, and the destruction of free
election, where Catholics have a right to their children's Catholic
education, afford evidence, in a matter so essential to the life of the
Church, of the extreme gravity of the situation and the anxiety of every
Christian conscience; even now Our responsibility for Christian souls
induces Us not to overlook the last possibilities, however slight, of a
return to fidelity to treaties, and to any arrangement that may be
acceptable to the episcopate. We shall continue without failing, to stand
before the rulers of your people as the defender of violated rights, and
in obedience to Our Conscience and Our pastoral mission, whether We be
successful or not, to oppose the policy which seeks, by open or secret
means, to strangle rights guaranteed by a treaty.

6. Different, however, Venerable Brethren, is the purpose of this letter.
As you affectionately visited Us in Our illness, so also We turn to you,
and through you, the German Catholics, who, like all suffering and
afflicted children, are nearer to their Father's heart. At a time when
your faith, like gold, is being tested in the fire of tribulation and
persecution, when your religious freedom is beset on all sides, when the
lack of religious teaching and of normal defense is heavily weighing on
you, you have every right to words of truth and spiritual comfort from
him whose first predecessor heard these words from the Lord: "I have
prayed for thee that thy faith fail not: and thou being once converted,
confirm thy brethren" (Luke xxii. 32).

7. Take care, Venerable Brethren, that above all, faith in God, the first
and irreplaceable foundation of all religion, be preserved in Germany
pure and unstained. The believer in God is not he who utters the name in
his speech, but he for whom this sacred word stands for a true and worthy
concept of the Divinity. Whoever identifies, by pantheistic confusion,
God and the universe, by either lowering God to the dimensions of the
world, or raising the world to the dimensions of God, is not a believer
in God. Whoever follows that so-called pre-Christian Germanic conception
of substituting a dark and impersonal destiny for the personal God,
denies thereby the Wisdom and Providence of God who "Reacheth from end to
end mightily, and ordereth all things sweetly" (Wisdom viii. 1). Neither
is he a believer in God.

8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form
of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of
the human community--however necessary and honorable be their function in
worldly things--whoever raises these notions above their standard value
and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order
of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in
God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds.

9. Beware, Venerable Brethren, of that growing abuse, in speech as in
writing, of the name of God as though it were a meaningless label, to be
affixed to any creation, more or less arbitrary, of human speculation.
Use your influence on the Faithful, that they refuse to yield to this
aberration. Our God is the Personal God, supernatural, omnipotent,
infinitely perfect, one in the Trinity of Persons, tri-personal in the
unity of divine essence, the Creator of all existence. Lord, King and
ultimate Consummator of the history of the world, who will not, and
cannot, tolerate a rival God by His side.

10. This God, this Sovereign Master, has issued commandments whose value
is independent of time and space, country and race. As God's sun shines
on every human face so His law knows neither privilege nor exception.
Rulers and subjects, crowned and uncrowned, rich and poor are equally
subject to His word. From the fullness of the Creators' right there
naturally arises the fullness of His right to be obeyed by individuals
and communities, whoever they are. This obedience permeates all branches
of activity in which moral values claim harmony with the law of God, and
pervades all integration of the ever-changing laws of man into the
immutable laws of God.

11. None but superficial minds could stumble into concepts of a national
God, of a national religion; or attempt to lock within the frontiers of a
single people, within the narrow limits of a single race, God, the
Creator of the universe, King and Legislator of all nations before whose
immensity they are "as a drop of a bucket" (Isaiah xI, 15).

12. The Bishops of the Church of Christ, "ordained in the things that
appertain to God (Heb. v, 1) must watch that pernicious errors of this
sort, and consequent practices more pernicious still, shall not gain a
footing among their flock. It is part of their sacred obligations to do
whatever is in their power to enforce respect for, and obedience to, the
commandments of God, as these are the necessary foundation of all private
life and public morality; to see that the rights of His Divine Majesty,
His name and His word be not profaned; to put a stop to the blasphemies,
which, in words and pictures, are multiplying like the sands of the
desert; to encounter the obstinacy and provocations of those who deny,
despise and hate God, by the never-failing reparatory prayers of the
Faithful, hourly rising like incense to the All-Highest and staying His
vengeance.

13. We thank you, Venerable Brethren, your priests and Faithful, who have
persisted in their Christian duty and in the defense of God's rights in
the teeth of an aggressive paganism. Our gratitude, warmer still and
admiring, goes out to those who, in fulfillment of their duty, have been
deemed worthy of sacrifice and suffering for the love of God.

14. No faith in God can for long survive pure and unalloyed without the
support of faith in Christ. "No one knoweth who the Son is, but the
Father: and who the Father is, but the Son and to whom the Son will
reveal Him" (Luke x. 22). "Now this is eternal life: That they may know
thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent" (John xvii.
3). Nobody, therefore, can say: "I believe in God, and that is enough
religion for me," for the Savior's words brook no evasion: "Whosoever
denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son
hath the Father also" (1 John ii. 23).

15. In Jesus Christ, Son of God made Man, there shone the plentitude of
divine revelation. "God, who at sundry times and in divers manners, spoke
in times past to the fathers by the prophets last of all, in these days
hath spoken to us by His Son" (Heb. i. 1). The sacred books of the Old
Testament are exclusively the word of God, and constitute a substantial
part of his revelation; they are penetrated by a subdued light,
harmonizing with the slow development of revelation, the dawn of the
bright day of the redemption. As should be expected in historical and
didactic books, they reflect in many particulars the imperfection, the
weakness and sinfulness of man. But side by side with innumerable touches
of greatness and nobleness, they also record the story of the chosen
people, bearers of the Revelation and the Promise, repeatedly straying
from God and turning to the world. Eyes not blinded by prejudice or
passion will see in this prevarication, as reported by the Biblical
history, the luminous splendor of the divine light revealing the saving
plan which finally triumphs over every fault and sin. It is precisely in
the twilight of this background that one perceives the striking
perspective of the divine tutorship of salvation, as it warms,
admonishes, strikes, raises and beautifies its elect. Nothing but
ignorance and pride could blind one to the treasures hoarded in the Old
Testament.

16. Whoever wishes to see banished from church and school the Biblical
history and the wise doctrines of the Old Testament, blasphemes the name
of God, blasphemes the Almighty's plan of salvation, and makes limited
and narrow human thought the judge of God's designs over the history of
the world: he denies his faith in the true Christ, such as He appeared in
the flesh, the Christ who took His human nature from a people that was to
crucify Him; and he understands nothing of that universal tragedy of the
Son of God who to His torturer's sacrilege opposed the divine and
priestly sacrifice of His redeeming death, and made the new alliance the
goal of the old alliance, its realization and its crown.

17. The peak of the revelation as reached in the Gospel of Christ is
final and permanent. It knows no retouches by human hand; it admits no
substitutes or arbitrary alternatives such as certain leaders pretend to
draw from the so-called myth of race and blood. Since Christ, the Lord's
Anointed, finished the task of Redemption, and by breaking up the reign
of sin deserved for us the grace of being the children God, since that
day no other name under heaven has been given to men, whereby we must be
saved (Acts iv. 12). No man, were every science, power and worldly
strength incarnated in him, can lay any other foundation but that which
is laid: which is Christ Jesus (1 Cor. iii 11). Should any man dare, in
sacrilegious disregard of the essential differences between God and His
creature, between the God-man and the children of man, to place a mortal,
were he the greatest of all times, by the side of, or over, or against,
Christ, he would deserve to be called prophet of nothingness, to whom the
terrifying words of Scripture would be applicable: "He that dwelleth in
heaven shall laugh at them" (Psalms ii. 3).

18. Faith in Christ cannot maintain itself pure and unalloyed without the
support of faith in the Church, "the pillar and ground of the truth" (1
Tim. iii. 15); for Christ Himself, God eternally blessed, raised this
pillar of the Faith. His command tO hear the Church (Matt. xviii. 15), to
welcome in the words and commands of the Church His own words and His own
commands (Luke x. 16), is addressed to all men, of all times and of all
countries. The Church founded by the Redeemer is one, the same for all
races and all nations. Beneath her dome, as beneath the vault of heaven,
there is but one country for all nations and tongues; there is room for
the development of every quality, advantage, task and vocation which God
the Creator and Savior has allotted to individuals as well as to ethnical
communities. The Church's maternal heart is big enough to see in the
God-appointed development of individual characteristics and gifts, more
than a mere danger of divergency. She rejoices at the spiritual
superiorities among individuals and nations. In their successes she sees
with maternal joy and pride fruits of education and progress, which she
can only bless and encourage, whenever she can conscientiously do so. But
she also knows that tO this freedom limits have been set by the majesty
of the divine command, which founded that Church one and indivisible.
Whoever tampers with that unity and that indivisibility wrenches from the
Spouse of Christ one of the diadems with which God Himself crowned her;
he subjects a divine structure, which stands on eternal foundations, tO
criticism and transformation by architects whom the Father of Heaven
never authorized to interfere.

19. The Church, whose work lies among men and operates through men, may
see her divine mission obscured by human, too human, combination,
persistently growing and developing like the cockle among the wheat of
the Kingdom of God. Those who know the Savior's words on scandal and the
giver of scandals, know, too, the judgment which the Church and all her
sons must pronounce on what was and what is sin. But if, besides these
reprehensible discrepancies be between faith and life, acts and words,
exterior conduct and interior feelings, however numerous they be, anyone
overlooks the overwhelming sum of authentic virtues, of spirit of
sacrifice, fraternal love, heroic efforts of sanctity, he gives evidence
of deplorable blindness and injustice. If later he forgets to apply the
standard of severity, by which he measures the Church he hates, to other
organizations in which he happens to be interested, then his appeal to an
offended sense of purity identifies him with those who, for seeing the
mote in their brother's eye, according to the Savior's incisive words,
cannot see the beam in their own. But however suspicious the intention of
those who make it their task, nay their vile profession, to scrutinize
what is human in the Church, and although the priestly powers conferred
by God are independent of the priest's human value, it yet remains true
that at no moment of history, no individual, in no organization can
dispense himself from the duty of loyally examining his conscience, of
mercilessly purifying himself, and energetically renewing himself in
spirit and in action. In Our Encyclical on the priesthood We have urged
attention to the sacred duty of all those who belong to the Church,
chiefly the members of the priestly and religious profession and of the
lay apostolate, to square their faith and their conduct with the claims
of the law of God and of the Church. And today we again repeat with all
the insistency We can command: it is not enough to be a member of the
Church of Christ, one needs to be a living member, in spirit and in
truth, i.e., living in the state of grace and in the presence of God,
either in innocence or in sincere repentance. If the Apostle of the
nations, the vase of election, chastised his body and brought it into
subjection: lest perhaps, when he had preached to others, he himself
should become a castaway (1 Cor. ix. 27), could anybody responsible for
the extension of the Kingdom of God claim any other method but personal
sanctification? Only thus can we show to the present generation, and to
the critics of the Church that "the salt of the earth," the leaven of
Christianity has not decayed, but is ready to give the men of
today--prisoners of doubt and error, victims of indifference, tired of
their Faith and straying from God--the spiritual renewal they so much
need. A Christianity which keeps a grip on itself, refuses every
compromise with the world, takes the commands of God and the Church
seriously, preserves its love of God and of men in all its freshness,
such a Christianity can be, and will be, a model and a guide to a world
which is sick to death and clamors for directions, unless it be condemned
to a catastrophe that would baffle the imagination.

20. Every true and lasting reform has ultimately sprung from the sanctity
of men who were driven by the love of God and of men. Generous, ready to
stand to attention to any call from God, yet confident in themselves
because confident in their vocation, they grew to the size of beacons and
reformers. On the other hand, any reformatory zeal, which instead of
springing from personal purity, flashes out of passion, has produced
unrest instead of light, destruction instead of construction, and more
than once set up evils worse than those it was out to remedy. No doubt
"the Spirit breatheth where he will" (John iii. 8): "of stones He is able
to raise men to prepare the way to his designs" (Matt. iii. 9). He
chooses the instruments of His will according to His own plans, not those
of men. But the Founder of the Church, who breathed her into existence at
Pentecost, cannot disown the foundations as He laid them. Whoever is
moved by the spirit of God, spontaneously adopts both outwardly and
inwardly, the true attitude toward the Church, this sacred fruit from the
tree of the cross, this gift from the Spirit of God, bestowed on
Pentecost day to an erratic world.

21. In your country, Venerable Brethren, voices are swelling into a
chorus urging people to leave the Church, and among the leaders there is
more than one whose official position is intended to create the
impression that this infidelity to Christ the King constitutes a signal
and meritorious act of loyalty to the modern State. Secret and open
measures of intimidation, the threat of economic and civic disabilities,
bear on the loyalty of certain classes of Catholic functionaries, a
pressure which violates every human right and dignity. Our wholehearted
paternal sympathy goes out to those who must pay so dearly for their
loyalty to Christ and the Church; but directly the highest interests are
at stake, with the alternative of spiritual loss, there is but one
alternative left, that of heroism. If the oppressor offers one the Judas
bargain of apostasy he can only, at the cost of every worldly sacrifice,
answer with Our Lord: "Begone, Satan! For it is written: The Lord thy God
shalt thou adore, and Him only shalt thou serve" (Matt. iv. 10). And
turning to the Church, he shall say: "Thou, my mother since my infancy,
the solace of my life and advocate at my death, may my tongue cleave to
my palate if, yielding to worldly promises or threats, I betray the vows
of my baptism." As to those who imagine that they can reconcile exterior
infidelity tO one and the same Church, let them hear Our Lord's
warning:--"He that shall deny me before men shall be denied before the
angels of God" (Luke xii. 9).

22. Faith in the Church cannot stand pure and true without the support of
faith in the primacy of the Bishop of Rome. The same moment when Peter,
in the presence of all the Apostles and disciples, confesses his faith in
Christ, Son of the Living God, the answer he received in reward for his
faith and his confession was the word that built the Church, the only
Church of Christ, on the rock of Peter (Matt. xvi. 18). Thus was sealed
the connection between the faith in Christ, the Church and the Primacy.
True and lawful authority is invariably a bond of unity, a source of
strength, a guarantee against division and ruin, a pledge for the future:
and this is verified in the deepest and sublimest sense, when that
authority, as in the case of the Church, and the Church alone, is sealed
by the promise and the guidance of the Holy Ghost and His irresistible
support. Should men, who are not even united by faith in Christ, come and
offer you the seduction of a national German Church, be convinced that it
is nothing but a denial of the one Church of Christ and the evident
betrayal of that universal evangelical mission, for which a world Church
alone is qualified and competent. The live history of other national
churches with their paralysis, their domestication and subjection to
worldly powers, is sufficient evidence of the sterility to which is
condemned every branch that is severed from the trunk of the living
Church. Whoever counters these erroneous developments with an
uncompromising No from the very outset, not only serves the purity of his
faith in Christ, but also the welfare and the vitality of his own people.

23. You will need to watch carefully, Venerable Brethren, that religious
fundamental concepts be not emptied of their content and distorted to
profane use. "Revelation" in its Christian sense, means the word of God
addressed to man. The use of this word for the "suggestions" of race and
blood, for the irradiations of a people's history, is mere equivocation.
False coins of this sort do not deserve Christian currency. "Faith"
consists in holding as true what God has revealed and proposes through
His Church to man's acceptance. It is "the evidence of things that appear
not" (Heb. ii. 1). The joyful and proud confidence in the future of one's
people, instinct in every heart, is quite a different thing from faith in
a religious sense. To substitute the one for the other, and demand on the
strength of this, to be numbered among the faithful followers of Christ,
is a senseless play on words, if it does not conceal a confusion of
concepts, or worse.

24. "Immortality" in a Christian sense means the survival of man after
his terrestrial death, for the purpose of eternal reward or punishment.
Whoever only means by the term, the collective survival here on earth of
his people for an indefinite length of time, distorts one of the
fundamental notions of the Christian Faith and tampers with the very
foundations of the religious concept of the universe, which requires a
moral order.

25. "Original sin" is the hereditary but impersonal fault of Adam's
descendants, who have sinned in him (Rom. v. 12). It is the loss of
grace, and therefore of eternal life, together with a propensity to evil,
which everybody must, with the assistance of grace, penance, resistance
and moral effort, repress and conquer. The passion and death of the Son
of God has redeemed the world from the hereditary curse of sin and death.
Faith in these truths, which in your country are today the butt of the
cheap derision of Christ's enemies, belongs to the inalienable treasury
of Christian revelation.

26. The cross of Christ, though it has become to many a stumbling block
and foolishness (1 Cor. i. 23) remains for the believer the holy sign of
his redemption, the emblem of moral strength and greatness. We live in
its shadow and die in its embrace. It will stand on our grave as a pledge
of our faith and our hope in the eternal light.

27. Humility in the spirit of the Gospel and prayer for the assistance of
grace are perfectly compatible with self-confidence and heroism. The
Church of Christ, which throughout the ages and to the present day
numbers more confessors and voluntary martyrs than any other moral
collectivity, needs lessons from no one in heroism of feeling and action.
The odious pride of reformers only covers itself with ridicule when it
rails at Christian humility as though it were but a cowardly pose of
self-degradation.

28. "Grace," in a wide sense, may stand for any of the Creator's gifts to
His creature; but in its Christian designation, it means all the
supernatural tokens of God's love; God's intervention which raises man to
that intimate communion of life with Himself, called by the Gospel
"adoption of the children of God." "Behold what manner of charity the
Father hath bestowed on us, that we should be called and should be the
sons of God" (1 John iii. 1). To discard this gratuitous and free
elevation in the name of a so-called German type amounts to repudiating
openly a fundamental truth of Christianity. It would be an abuse of our
religious vocabulary to place on the same level supernatural grace and
natural gifts. Pastors and guardians of the people of God will do well to
resist this plunder of sacred things and this confusion of ideas.



To: E who wrote (2467)10/24/2000 10:48:09 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 28931
 
Part II of Mit Brennender Sorge ("With Burning Sorrow"):

29. It is on faith in God, preserved pure and stainless, that man's
morality is based. All efforts to remove from under morality and the
moral order the granite foundation of faith and to substitute for it the
shifting sands of human regulations, sooner or later lead these
individuals or societies to moral degradation. The fool who has said in
his heart "there is no God" goes straight to moral corruption (Psalms
xiii. 1), and the number of these fools who today are out to sever
morality from religion, is legion. They either do not see or refuse to
see that the banishment of confessional Christianity, i.e., the clear and
precise notion of Christianity, from teaching and education, from the
organization of social and political life, spells spiritual spoliation
and degradation. No coercive power of the State, no purely human ideal,
however noble and lofty it be, will ever be able to make shift of the
supreme and decisive impulses generated by faith in God and Christ. If
the man, who is called to the hard sacrifice of his own ego to the common
good, loses the support of the eternal and the divine, that comforting
and consoling faith in a God who rewards all good and punishes all evil,
then the result of the majority will be, not the acceptance, but the
refusal of their duty. The conscientious observation of the ten
commandments of God and the precepts of the Church (which are nothing but
practical specifications of rules of the Gospels) is for every one an
unrivaled school of personal discipline, moral education and formation of
character, a school that is exacting, but not to excess. A merciful God,
who as Legislator, says--Thou must!--also gives by His grace the power to
will and to do. To let forces of moral formation of such efficacy lie
fallow, or to exclude them positively from public education, would spell
religious under-feeding of a nation. To hand over the moral law to man's
subjective opinion, which changes with the times, instead of anchoring it
in the holy will of the eternal God and His commandments, is to open wide
every door to the forces of destruction. The resulting dereliction of the
eternal principles of an objective morality, which educates conscience
and ennobles every department and organization of life, is a sin against
the destiny of a nation, a sin whose bitter fruit will poison future
generations.

30. Such is the rush of present-day life that it severs from the divine
foundation of Revelation, not only morality, but also the theoretical and
practical rights. We are especially referring to what is called the
natural law, written by the Creator's hand on the tablet of the heart
(Rom. ii. 14) and which reason, not blinded by sin or passion, can easily
read. It is in the light of the commands of this natural law, that all
positive law, whoever be the lawgiver, can be gauged in its moral
content, and hence, in the authority it wields over conscience. Human
laws in flagrant contradiction with the natural law are vitiated with a
taint which no force, no power can mend. In the light of this principle
one must judge the axiom, that "right is common utility," a proposition
which may be given a correct significance, it means that what is morally
indefensible, can never contribute to the good of the people. But ancient
paganism acknowledged that the axiom, to be entirely true, must be
reversed and be made to say: "Nothing can be useful, if it is not at the
same time morally good" (Cicero, De Off. ii. 30). Emancipated from this
oral rule, the principle would in international law carry a perpetual
state of war between nations; for it ignores in national life, by
confusion of right and utility, the basic fact that man as a person
possesses rights he holds from God, and which any collectivity must
protect against denial, suppression or neglect. To overlook this truth is
to forget that the real common good ultimately takes its measure from
man's nature, which balances personal rights and social obligations, and
from the purpose of society, established for the benefit of human nature.
Society, was intended by the Creator for the full development of
individual possibilities, and for the social benefits, which by a give
and take process, every one can claim for his own sake and that of
others. Higher and more general values, which collectivity alone can
provide, also derive from the Creator for the good of man, and for the
full development, natural and supernatural, and the realization of his
perfection. To neglect this order is to shake the pillars on which
society rests, and to compromise social tranquillity, security and
existence.

31. The believer has an absolute right to profess his Faith and live
according to its dictates. Laws which impede this profession and practice
of Faith are against natural law.

Parents who are earnest and conscious of their educative duties, have a
primary right to the education of the children God has given them in the
spirit of their Faith, and according to its prescriptions. Laws and
measures which in school questions fail to respect this freedom of the
parents go against natural law, and are immoral. The Church, whose
mission it is to preserve and explain the natural law, as it is divine in
its origin, cannot but declare that the recent enrollment into schools
organized without a semblance of freedom, is the result of unjust
pressure, and is a violation of every common right.

32. As the Vicar of Him who said to the young man of the Gospel: "If thou
wilt enter into life, keep the commandments" (Matt. xix. 17), We address
a few paternal words to the young.

33. Thousands of voices ring into your ears a Gospel which has not been
revealed by the Father of Heaven. Thousands of pens are wielded in the
service of a Christianity, which is not of Christ. Press and wireless
daily force on you productions hostile to the Faith and to the Church,
impudently aggressive against whatever you should hold venerable and
sacred. Many of you, clinging to your Faith and to your Church, as a
result of your affiliation with religious associations guaranteed by the
concordat, have often to face the tragic trial of seeing your loyalty to
your country misunderstood, suspected, or even denied, and of being hurt
in your professional and social life. We are well aware that there is
many a humble soldier of Christ in your ranks, who with torn feelings,
but a determined heart, accepts his fate, finding his one consolation in
the thought of suffering insults for the name of Jesus (Acts v. 41).
Today,

as We see you threatened with new dangers and new molestations, We say to
you: If any one should preach to you a Gospel other than the one you
received on the knees of a pious mother, from the lips of a believing
father, or through teaching faithful to God and His Church, "let him be
anathema" (Gal. i. 9). If the State organizes a national youth, and makes
this organization obligatory to all, then, without prejudice to rights of
religious associations, it is the absolute right of youths as well as of
parents to see to it that this organization is purged of all
manifestations hostile to the Church and Christianity. These
manifestations are even today placing Christian parents in a painful
alternative, as they cannot give to the State what they owe to God alone.

34. No one would think of preventing young Germans establishing a true
ethnical community in a noble love of freedom and loyalty to their
country. What We object to is the voluntary and systematic antagonism
raised between national education and religious duty. That is why we tell
the young: Sing your hymns to freedom, but do not forget the freedom of
the children of God. Do not drag the nobility of that freedom in the mud
of sin and sensuality. He who sings hymns of loyalty to this terrestrial
country should not, for that reason, become unfaithful to God and His
Church, or a deserter and traitor to His heavenly country. You are often
told about heroic greatness, in Iying opposition to evangelical humility
and patience. Why conceal the fact that there are heroisms in moral life?
That the preservation of baptismal innocence is an act of heroism which
deserves credit? You are often told about the human deficiencies which
mar the history of the Church: why ignore the exploits which fill her
history, the saints she begot, the blessing that came upon Western
civilization from the union between that Church and your people? You are
told about sports. Indulged in with moderation and within limits,
physical education is a boon for youth. But so much time is now devoted
to sporting activities, that the harmonious development of body and mind
is disregarded, that duties to one's family, and the observation of the
Lord's Day are neglected. With an indifference bordering on contempt the
day of the Lord is divested of its sacred character, against the best of
German traditions. But We expect the Catholic youth, in the more
favorable organizations of the State, to uphold its right tO a Christian
sanctification of the Sunday, not tO exercise the body at the expense of
the immortal soul, not to be overcome by evil, but to aim at the triumph
of good over evil (Rom. xii. 21) as its highest achievement will be the
gaining of the crown in the stadium of eternal life (1 Cor. ix. 24).

35. We address a special word of congratulation, encouragement and
exhortation to the priests of Germany, who, in difficult times and
delicate situations, have, under the direction of their Bishops, to guide
the flocks of Christ along the straight road, by word and example, by
their daily devotion and apostolic patience. Beloved sons, who
participate with Us in the sacred mysteries, never tire of exercising,
after the Sovereign and eternal Priest, Jesus Christ, the charity and
solicitude of the Good Samaritan. Let your daily conduct remain stainless
before God and the incessant pursuit of your perfection and
sanctification, in merciful charity towards all those who are confided to
your care, especially those who are more exposed, who are weak and
stumbling. Be the guides of the faithful, the support of those who fail,
the doctors of the doubting, the consolers of the afflicted, the
disinterested counselors and assistants of all. The trials and sufferings
which your people have undergone in post-War days have not passed over
its soul without leaving painful marks. They have left bitterness and
anxiety which are slow to cure, except by charity. This charity is the
apostle's indispensable weapon, in a world torn by hatred. It will make
you forget, or at least forgive, many an undeserved insult now more
frequent than ever.

36. This charity, intelligent and sympathetic towards those even who
offend you, does by no means imply a renunciation of the right of
proclaiming, vindicating and defending the truth and its implications.
The priest's first loving gift to his neighbors is to serve truth and
refute error in any of its forms. Failure on this score would be not only
a betrayal of God and your vocation, but also an offense against the real
welfare of your people and country. To all those who have kept their
promised fidelity to their Bishops on the day of their ordination; to all
those who in the exercise of their priestly function are called upon to
suffer persecution; to all those imprisoned in jail and concentration
camps, the Father of the Christian world sends his words of gratitude and
commendation.

37. Our paternal gratitude also goes out to Religious and nuns, as well
as Our sympathy for so many who, as a result of administrative measures
hostile to Religious Orders, have been wrenched from the work of their
vocation. If some have fallen and shown themselves unworthy of their
vocation, their fault, which the Church punishes, in no way detracts from
the merit of the immense majority, who, in voluntary abnegation and
poverty, have tried to serve their God and their country. By their zeal,
their fidelity, their virtue, their active charity, their devotion, the
Orders devoted to the care of souls, the service of the sick and
education, are greatly contributing to private and public welfare. No
doubt better days will come to do them better justice than the present
troublous times have done. We trust that the heads of religious
communities will profit by their trials and difficulties tO renew their
zeal, their spirit of prayer, the austerity of their lives and their
perfect discipline, in order to draw down God's blessing upon their
difficult work.

38. We visualize the immense multitudes of Our faithful children, Our
sons and daughters, for whom the sufferings of the Church in Germany and
their own have left intact their devotion to the cause of God, their
tender love for the Father of Christendom, their obedience to their
pastors, their joyous resolution to remain ever faithful, happen what
may, to the sacred inheritance of their ancestors. To all of them We send
Our paternal greetings. And first to the members of those religious
associations which, bravely and at the cost of untold sacrifices, have
remained faithful to Christ, and have stood by the rights which a solemn
treaty had guaranteed to the Church and to themselves according to the
rules of loyalty and good faith.

39. We address Our special greetings to the Catholic parents. Their
rights and duties as educators, conferred on them by God, are at present
the stake of a campaign pregnant with consequences. The Church cannot
wait to deplore the devastation of its altars, the destruction of its
temples, if an education, hostile to Christ, is to profane the temple of
the child's soul consecrated by baptism, and extinguish the eternal light
of the faith in Christ for the sake of counterfeit light alien to the
Cross. Then the violation of temples is nigh, and it will be every one's
duty to sever his responsibility from the opposite camp, and free his
conscience from guilty cooperation with such corruption. The more the
enemies attempt to disguise their designs, the more a distrustful
vigilance will be needed, in the light of bitter experience. Religious
lessons maintained for the sake of appearances, controlled by
unauthorized men, within the frame of an educational system which
systematically works against religion, do not justify a vote in favor of
non-confessional schools. We know, dear Catholic parents, that your vote
was not free, for a free and secret vote would have meant the triumph of
the Catholic schools. Therefore, we shall never cease frankly to
represent to the responsible authorities the iniquity of the pressure
brought to bear on you and the duty of respecting the freedom of
education. Yet do not forget this: none can free you from the
responsibility God has placed on you over your children. None of your
oppressors, who pretend to relieve you of your duties can answer for you
to the eternal Judge, when he will ask: "Where are those I confided to
you?" May every one of you be able to answer: "Of them whom thou hast
given me, I have not lost any one" (John xviii. 9).

40. Venerable Brethren, We are convinced that the words which in this
solemn moment We address to you, and to the Catholics of the German
Empire, will find in the hearts and in the acts of Our Faithful, the echo
responding to the solicitude of the common Father. If there is one thing
We implore the Lord to grant, it is this, that Our words may reach the
ears and the hearts of those who have begun to yield to the threats and
enticements of the enemies of Christ and His Church.

41. We have weighed every word of this letter in the balance of truth and
love. We wished neither to be an accomplice to equivocation by an
untimely silence, nor by excessive severity to harden the hearts of those
who live under Our pastoral responsibility; for Our pastoral love pursues
them none the less for all their infidelity. Should those who are trying
to adapt their mentality to their new surroundings, have for the paternal
home they have left and for the Father Himself, nothing but words of
distrust, in gratitude or insult, should they even forget whatever they
forsook, the day will come when their anguish will fall on the children
they have lost, when nostalgia will bring them back to "God

who was the joy of their youth," to the Church whose paternal hand has
directed them on the road that leads to the Father of Heaven.

42. Like other periods of the history of the Church, the present has
ushered in a new ascension of interior purification, on the sole
condition that the faithful show themselves proud enough in the
confession of their faith in Christ, generous enough in suffering to face
the oppressors of the Church with the strength of their faith and
charity. May the holy time of Lent and Easter, which preaches interior
renovation and penance, turn Christian eyes towards the Cross and the
risen Christ; be for all of you the joyful occasion that will fill your
souls with heroism, patience and victory. Then We are sure, the enemies
of the Church, who think that their time has come, will see that their
joy was premature, and that they may close the grave they had dug. The
day will come when the Te Deum of liberation will succeed to the
premature hymns of the enemies of Christ: Te Deum of triumph and joy and
gratitude, as the German people return to religion, bend the knee before
Christ, and arming themselves against the enemies of God, again resume
the task God has laid upon them.

43. He who searches the hearts and reins (Psalm vii. 10) is Our witness
that We have no greater desire than to see in Germany the restoration of
a true peace between Church and State. But if, without any fault of Ours,
this peace is not to come, then the Church of God will defend her rights
and her freedom in the name of the Almighty whose arm has not shortened.
Trusting in Him, "We cease not to pray and to beg" (Col. i. 9) for you,
children of the Church, that the days of tribulation may end and that you
may be found faithful in the day of judgment; for the persecutors and
oppressors, that the Father of light and mercy may enlighten them as He
enlightened Saul on the road of Damascus. With this prayer in Our heart
and on Our lips We grant to you, as a pledge of Divine help, as a support
in your difficult resolutions, as a comfort in the struggle, as a
consolation in all trials, to You, Bishops and Pastors of the Faithful,
priests, Religious, lay apostles of Catholic Action, to all your
diocesans, and specially to the sick and the prisoners, in paternal love,
Our Apostolic Benediction.

Given at the Vatican on Passion Sunday, March 14, 1937.



To: E who wrote (2467)10/24/2000 10:52:49 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 28931
 
This is an excerpt from an article entitled "Catholic Heroes of the Holocaust":

>>But what of the official Church? In the past year there has been a fresh irruption of stories about the alleged inaction of the hierarchy, and especially the "silence" of
Pope Pius XII, stories worse in some ways even than Rolf Hochhuth's scurrilous 1963 play, "The Deputy." Even The New Yorker, in its April 7, 1997 edition,
printed an article that asserted Pius and the hierarchy turned their backs on the Jews; and journals such as The Catholic Times and The National Catholic
Register (owned by the Legionaries of Christ) in reporting the progress of a document on the Holocaust being prepared by the Pontifical Commission for Religious
Relations with the Jews, treat the question as open.

Probably the most systematic and comprehensive study of the Pope's and the hierarchy's handling of the Holocaust is Pinchas Lapide's 1967 book, Three Popes
and the Jews. Lapide, an Israeli diplomat, was a member of the Palestinian Brigade that found many interned Jews in Italy at the end of World War II. After
exhaustive research, Lapide concluded that at least 700,000 Jews, and more likely 860,000, owed their lives directly to the Church; he also concluded that Pius
simply could not have done more than he did. The suggestion that Pius ought to have spoken more forcefully he treats with near derision; he quotes many Jewish
leaders, many of them rescued by Catholics, to the effect that more forceful speeches would certainly not have caused the Nazis to moderate the persecutions, and
would most probably have induced them to intensify them.

Not that the Pope was silent. As early as April 1935, as Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Pacelli addressed 250,000 pilgrims at Lourdes: "These [Nazi]
ideologues are in fact only miserable plagiarizers who dress up ancient error in new tinsel. It matters little whether they rally round the flag of the social revolution...or
are possessed by the superstition of race and blood." He was responsible for the final wording of Pius XI's March 1937 encyclical, Mit brennender Sorge ("With
burning sorrow"), and made it more strongly antiracist. The encyclical, the first ever written in German, was read in all German churches on Palm Sunday; the Nazi
Foreign Office characterized it as "a call to battle…as it calls upon Catholic citizens to rebel against the authority of the Reich."2

In 1938 Italy passed its first anti-Jewish laws. Pius XI condemned them. He took action, as well. In January 1939 he asked the ambassadors to the Vatican to
procure entry visas to their countries for German and Italian Jews. He also called a German bishop to Rome to plan a resettlement project in Sao Paulo. Presumably
his Secretary of State was involved in these initiatives (General Ludendorf wrote: "Pacelli was the live spirit which stood behind all the anti-German activities of
Rome's policy"3); but he would not be Secretary of State much longer. Pius XI died in February.

Cardinal Pacelli was elected as Pius XII in March. As one of the standard first steps in the persecution, Jews were now banned from the learned professions. The
new Pope invited many to the Vatican and offered to help them to emigrate; many accepted, and Pius intervened with the diplomats of other countries to obtain entry
visas for them.

Italy declared war on France on June 10, 1940. The Pope was determined to keep the Vatican neutral, and to make it a refuge. He brought the diplomats of nations
at war with the Axis into the Papal Hospice of Santa Marta, close to the Holy Office and the German College. He assigned the Holy Office to develop its contacts
throughout Europe into a chain of agents who would deal with intelligence, prisoners of war and refugees. One of the most fascinating rescuers of the war, Msgr.
Hugh O'Flaherty, Primo Notario of the Holy Office, thus became involved early on in the Vatican's information-gathering and humanitarian activities—informally,
also, as he lived in the German College, next door to the diplomats' new quarters.

Also during June, some 500 Jews left Bratislava on a small boat bound for Palestine. Four months later the boat tried to enter the harbor at Istanbul and was denied
permission. An Italian patrol boat picked up the passengers and took them to a prison camp on Rhodes. Warned that they were to be handed over to the Germans,
these Jews sent one of their number to Rome, where he obtained an audience with the Pope. Pius intervened with the Italian government and all 500 were interned in
southern Calabria, where they survived the war.

Pinchas Lapide reports arriving at Ferramonti-Tarsia to find 3,200 Jews, mostly refugees from Austria, Czechoslovakia and Hungary. "They had been not only saved
by papal intervention but also fed, clad and looked after at Vatican expense by two papal emissaries who set up a kosher kitchen, organized a school for the
children…."4

But do the Pope's efforts qualify him as a rescuer, as someone who risked his life to save Jews? In 1940 Martin Bormann prepared "Operation Pontiff" on Hitler's
instructions. Pius was to be imprisoned in a monastery on the Wartburg. Lapide thinks it probable that Pius knew of the plan. If so, it did not deter him. As the Nazi
persecution of the Jews intensified, and as it spread to the countries occupied by German forces, so did Vatican efforts at rescue and shelter. And Pius instructed the
European hierarchy to follow his lead. "There is no doubt," says Leon Poliakov, a Jewish historian of the Holocaust, "that secret instructions went out from the
Vatican urging the national churches to intervene in favor of the Jews by every possible means."5

In the Heart of the Reich

Even in Germany, Catholic bishops protested the treatment of the Jews. Priests spoke out against Nazism and paid for it with their lives; laymen sheltered Jews.

Hitler came to power in 1933. In December of that year, Cardinal Michael Faulhaber, the "Lion of Munich," delivered a sermon in defense of biblical Judaism. When
the persecution escalated, he spoke more directly to the point:

"History teaches us that God always punished the tormenters of…the Jews. No Roman Catholic approves of the persecutions of Jews in Germany."6

In October 1938, the chief rabbi of Munich told Cardinal Faulhaber that he feared his synagogue would be burned. The Cardinal provided a truck to transport the
Torah scrolls and other important things from the synagogue for safekeeping in his palace. Nazi mobs gathered outside the palace, screaming, "Away with Faulhaber,
the Jew- friend!"7

But Faulhaber and other bishops, including Conrad Cardinal Count von Preysing of Berlin and Bishop Clemens August Count von Galen of Muenster, continued to
speak out in defense of the Jews in sermons and pastoral letters. (It was von Galen who went to Rome to plan the resettlement in Sao Paulo with Pope Pius XI.)

Faulhaber's books were banned, and in 1934 and 1938 attempts were made to assassinate him. He continued to preach against the Nazis until the end of the war.

In Stuttgart, the Resistance developed a well-organized underground to help the Jews to escape. In Hamburg, Raphaels Verein, a Catholic lay association, helped
Jews to emigrate until they were shut down by the Gestapo in 1941.

Also in 1941, Fr. Bernard Lichtenberg, a priest at the St. Hedwig Cathedral Church in Berlin, declared in a sermon that he would include the Jews in his daily
prayers "because synagogues have been set afire and Jewish businesses have been destroyed."8 He was arrested for subversive activities and sent first to prison and
then to a concentration camp. He asked to be sent to the Jewish ghetto at Lodz, but died on his way to Dachau.

~ ~ ~

Caritas Catholica, another lay organization, was originally founded to help non- Aryan Christians, but extended its mission to assisting Jews. In the spring of 1943 the
Gestapo arrested its leadership, including Dr. Gertrude Luckner. "[T]he Gestapo demanded to know who was behind her operation. 'My Christian conscience,' she
told them."9 She was sent to Ravensbrueck concentration camp, where she survived until the Allied liberators arrived.

~ ~ ~

Almost incredibly, after ten years of Nazi rule there was still an organized Resistance in Germany. In 1943 Count Helmuth von Moltke, its leader, wrote to a friend in
England: "We now have nineteen guillotines working at full speed."10

A close friend of von Moltke, Fr. Alfred Delp, SJ, had been asked by his provincial the previous year to join the Kresau Circle, "a discussion group including
Lutherans and Catholics, aristocrats and labor leaders, that met to plan how German society could be reconstructed according to Christian principles after the
war."11 Von Molke was the founder of the Kresau group.

Father Delp had written and edited for the Jesuit journal Stimmen der Zeit ("Voices of the Time") until the Gestapo closed it in 1941. Now he helped Jews to
escape, often guiding them to the Swiss border; and he urged others, especially priests, to help also. His writings and his sermons emphasize Christ as "the judge of
history,…the only ruler in whose service men can find the free and truly human life they long for; any other course means delusion and ultimate tragedy."12

When the German generals' plot to assassinate Hitler failed in July 1944, the members of the Kresau Circle were arrested. On Christmas Day 1945, after nearly
eighteen months of interrogation and torture, Fr. Delp was led from his prison cell to be hanged. To his friend the prison chaplain he said, "In half an hour, I'll know
more than you do!"13

Of the 240,000 Jews who remained in Germany and Austria when the killing began, 7,000 survived.<<

Full text at:

columbia.edu