SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BIFS ... Patented Environmental Cleanup and Low Float Co. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (172)10/27/2000 3:39:12 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 381
 
In spite of "playing the percentages" somewhat unusually, this made me laugh for quite some time...at first I thought it had to be a spoof article, but it's not...

October 27, 2000
StockHouse News Desk
By Beth Price (bprice@stockhouse.com)

Mobile Internet: BIFS to Offer Wireless Broadband Paintball Pollution Control?

Miami, FL, October 27 /SHfn/ -- PR flaks at companies big and small dream about it. An article in a popular Wall Street Journal column, with their corporation's name proudly emblazoned above the fold of the Money & Investing section. It can make a product a best-seller, or a micro-cap company Wall Street's latest darling. It hasn't yet done either for BIFS Technologies [BIFS]. Like a StockHouse article a month earlier, the Journal raised some important questions on October 2, which executives have either failed to address or not answered satisfactorily. A recently announced alliance casts further doubt on the company's focus.

In the month following the StockHouse article, BIFS' share price fell by more than 50%. A significant rally on October 23 fueled shareholder's hopes, but in early-morning trading October 25, BIFS shares were back down trading in the $0.20s, nearly 40% below their price when StockHouse originally reported on the company. BIFS closed today at $0.26 a share.

For the year ending May 31, Internet commerce revenue reached $3,559--and no, that's not a typo.

Though it traces its roots to the wastewater treatment industry, BIFS offers Internet access through a product it calls SWOMI, or seamless, wireless, omni-directional, mobile Internet. The pollution control company, until recently known as BioFiltration Systems, entered the new economy with its acquisition of BeachAccess.net in April of this year. BIFS continues to pursue wastewater deals with airports nationwide, as well as Internet sales to hotels and condominiums in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The company's latest alliance may add yet another tune to the BIFS medley. On October 10, BIFS announced that it was exploring the potential of working with an outfit called eCom eCom.com [ECEC]. Though BIFS provided an erroneous ticker symbol in its press release, that's an easy mistake to make. The similarly named eCom.com Inc. [ECMM] and eCom Corp. [ECCM] trade over the counter alongside BIFS and eCom eCom. To keep them straight, just remember eCom eCom's vaguely suggestive web address: www.ecomecom.com.

Thankfully, moving to the seedier side of Internet commerce is not a direction the partnership is taking--though it could perhaps generate much-needed revenue. ECom eCom offers a "complete package of services to help businesses join and compete in today's New Economy." Like BIFS, though, eCom eCom has only recently entered the digital age.

How much money has eCom eCom made with its "e-commerce concepts and related properties"? A look at the company's annual report, filed with the SEC on September 13, shows the progress it's made so far. For the year ending May 31, Internet commerce revenue reached $3,559--and no, that's not a typo. Deals for an additional $150,000 cash received were logged as "unearned revenue," since eCom eCom has two contracts over the next two consecutive years to perform the work. Another division of eCom eCom, though, increased sales by 1152% in fiscal 2000, to $2,862,266. That group's focus? Paintball supplies.

Paintball. You know, that game of tag played by people armed with weapons that shoot pellets of paint. Perhaps angry shareholders brandishing eCom eCom's harmless yet messy Viper M1s will demand that BIFS' patent number be revealed once and for all. Or that the company finally stop claiming to be a Bulletin Board stock, when it was delisted some time ago. Though CEO Alpha Keyser thanked the Wall Street Journal "for pointing that out" (and several other news stories have mentioned it), a press release a week later still contained the error.

Investors may be better served by waiting until one company or the other has the numbers to prove it.

ECom eCom could turn out to be an e-commerce success. It's just too soon to tell. In its annual report, eCom eCom suggests that it will embrace the Internet "using the same e-commerce concepts that have made our paintball business grow so rapidly." The same document, though, makes it clear what has been responsible for that accomplishment. "The most significant factor in paintball sales growth has been the success of our advertising stemming from use of the 1-800-paintball toll-free telephone number acquired early in 1999." Does anyone hear 1-800-BIFSBALL?

Perhaps, too, through the alliance, the two companies will eventually develop "high-end consumer products that cater to the needs of businesses competing for a position in the electronic commerce market." While Keyser might believe that eCom eCom "possesses a solid business strategy that places access and practical solutions to the issues of e-commerce in the hands of small and medium sized businesses throughout the country," investors may be better served by waiting until one company or the other has the numbers to prove it.

Though BIFS' environmental division markets a product to treat airport run-off, maybe the company could look for additional synergies with eCom eCom… perhaps, say, developing a solution to clean up after a paint-ball massacre?

• • •


Australia Canada Hong Kong Japan Singapore UK Investment.com InvestorLinks.com

Home BullBoards News Releases Newsletters The Markets Portfolio Tracking
Disclaimer Privacy policy © Copyright 00 StockHouse Media Corporation
All Rights Reserved.

stockhouse.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (172)10/29/2000 10:27:38 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 381
 
There's something I'm wondering about. According to the Form 10, Baldridge arranged to buy a large quantity of BIFS stock in a Reg D private placement. What, exactly, was he meant to do with that stock? Keep it for himself, or resell it?

If the latter....well, let's just say I'd really like to see the contract BIFS cut with him.

On March 31, 1999, the Company entered into a cancelable special services agreement with The Baldridge Company, an unrelated active participation investor. Pursuant to this agreement, Baldridge was to provide various public relations and marketing services to the Company in exchange for the right to purchase 87,500,000 shares of the Company's stock for $1,000,000. The purchase of these shares will occur in stages, at varying per share prices ranging from $.0025 to $.20 per share. At March 31, 1999, the shares associated with this agreement were recorded as subscribed common shares.

In accordance with the above agreement, upon collection of the subscription price for the first stage, 25,000,000 shares of common stock were issued. For these shares, the $812,500 difference between the fair value of the stock at March 31, 1999, and its selling price, has been recorded as stock promotion expense. This was the only stage exercised by Baldridge.

On or about September 1, 1999, the Company was delisted from the OTCBB. Baldridge decided at that time not to continue purchasing the stock as agreed and defaulted on the contract. The Company notified Baldridge of the default and gave the required ten-day notice as specified in the contract.

Subsequently, the Company reduced the subscription price on the remaining 62,500,000 shares to $0.005 per share. In the accompanying financial statements the stock subscription receivable was adjusted to reflect the revised subscription price.

On March 4, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Harding Asset Funds, Inc. to purchase the remaining 62,500,000 shares for $0.005 or a total of $312,500. Harding was one of the original partners with Baldridge.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (172)10/30/2000 2:25:53 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 381
 
I'm still trying to run down "Harding Asset Funds". Keyser told John Emswhiller that the Mysterious March Investor (identified in the Form 10 as "Harding") was located in Riverview, FL. According to the Form 10, "Harding" was the "original partner" of Orville Baldridge.

So who have Baldridge's partners been? The Florida corporations database goes back about 15 years. There are several entries for Baldridge. In none of his companies did he ever have a partner called "Harding" or "Harding Asset Funds".

He has, though, worked frequently, in the past and present--see the document for the currently active Sterling Consulting, a Florida corporation--with one Charles R. Kiefner. Kiefner was the chaiman of Definition Ltd. Definition has changed names several times; the story is extremely complicated. They were and are, however, promoted by WorldVision, Baldridge's pr company.

Does Kiefner have anything to do with "Harding Asset Funds"?

fwiw, Riverview is near Tampa. If you search "local businesses" you won't find "Harding Asset Funds".

Now THIS is, I cheerfully admit, a reach: but once upon a time Charles Kiefner lived on Riverbend Drive in Altamonte, Florida...

For the Florida and Nevada corporations databases, see:

sunbiz.org
sos.state.nv.us