Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (31368)	10/25/2000 8:31:56 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Naaah! Don't you no Easy Al is in town and he'll save us, he always does.... <On the other hand confidnce would return to all makrets and economies as soon as Mr G releases the stranghold he has put on the market with unnecessarily high interest rates. Surely he will ease up when he sees the finacial system shudder as it surely will if your scenario even gets half way to first base.> Message 14661539

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (31368)	10/25/2000 9:03:58 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

You may recall John Roque (a Wall Street TA guy) made the observation back in Feb/Mar that the NASDAQ was 4 standard deviations above its 200 dma. He noted that no market in recorded history had ever done this, and was predicting a correction based on this. Anyway, he was on CNBC today, and mentioned that the NASDAQ could very well have to go 4 std devs below the 200 dma to find a bottom, which he cited as the ~2800 level, roughly. Tom

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (31368)	10/25/2000 10:43:09 PM
From: NucTrader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! This really is a funny idea! A sort of "Who wants to be a millionaire!?!" csf.colorado.edu