Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: canuck-l-head who wrote (10)	10/26/2000 6:09:49 PM
From: SofaSpud	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37125

There's gotta be something wrong with this guy... Of course there is. Keep this to yourself, but <whispering> he doesn't think that tax dollars belong to him. Think about it. How do you have progressive social policy from somebody who worries about the taxpayer? What about the national daycare program we need? What about funding for NAC and other interest groups? What about the court challenges program? What about paying penalties on cancelled contracts so we can avoid putting our people in safe helicopters? The guy would be a disaster! I heard the host on a radio talk show this afternoon talking about the paucity of vision among leaders now. How about the vision of having the federal government do only those things the constitution says its supposed to. Leave the rest of us with money in our pockets to implement "vision" on our own, without political hacks in the way.

To: canuck-l-head who wrote (10)	10/26/2000 11:07:47 PM
From: Lino...	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37125

Not fair........the socialist NDP nut should get a mention too..........don't discriminate against mental midgets

To: canuck-l-head who wrote (10)	11/2/2000 1:14:33 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 37125

Day is not scarey for his practise of religion, but for the extent to which he may or may not force the tenets of that religion on the rest of us ... one nuance from him in favour of state control of the bodies of women, for instance, and i absolutely must vote against him even though i do tend to see him as the least worse choice on economic grounds at the moment ... i still think Keith Martin was the better choice for Reform, while reputedly a practitioner of some religion he keeps it in his pants and doesn't swing it like a club at us Normal People.