To: William T. Katz who wrote (13529 ) 10/26/2000 7:44:06 PM From: pat mudge Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 24042 Second and just as important: the fact that JDSU doesn't see any demand issues does not mean that there are no demand issues. Just this morning, Worldcom (WCOM) reported that it will reduce its 2001 capital expenditures plan. Do you think that JDSU has seen this demand weakness yet? Absolutely not. Sometime next year, WCOM will be less aggressive with its purchases of optical systems. Then those optical systems companies will be less aggressive with their purchases of JDSU optical components. Being a components maker, JDSU is very much a lagging indicator. Does Briefing.com think JDSU's management didn't looked out a couple years before ramping their production across all lines by a factor of four? While carrier spending rates may contract, there is no way Briefing.com could predict a pull back in optics. To the contrary. Based on what was said by Lucent and Nortel, there will be a marked slowdown in circuit-switch-based spending and increased spending in IP-based systems. So even if over-all spending eases, the part that matters to JDSU and SDLI will expand. Being a components maker, JDSU is very much a lagging indicator. Quite the opposite. Being a components' maker makes these guys forward indicators as their products are designed into systems long before they're put in the field. This article has all the markings of someone in a highly-leveraged short position who stands to lose his hide in the buying panic that's already begun. You know that feeling you get when someone gives you too many excuses for being late? One you might have believed, but having them piled on top of each other as if so many multiple-choice options, you have to wonder if they're really just hoping one might apply. Briefing.com comes out with some great reports, but this isn't one. Pat