SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (33971)10/28/2000 12:45:30 PM
From: MarkR37  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
How is it an improvement? The primary benchmark used to determine value in the microprocessor market is speed. It offers less performance than current Intel and AMD chips. It also requires less power and produces less heat. Here is what Christensen said:

""Disruptive technologies bring to a market a very different value proposition than had been available previously. Generally, disruptive technologies under perform established products in mainstream markets. But they have other features that a few fringe (and generally new) customers value. Products based on disruptive technologies are typically cheaper, simpler, smaller, and, frequently, more convenient to use."

It is a very difficult task for an established firm to compete against these types of innovations. Typically, the established firms will retreat up the value chain and make faster, higher margin, products (think of EMC vs NTAP). This does not mean that Transmeta will be a great investment. But they will not have to take on Intel as AMD has done. They will be able to attack from below and try to develop their own new markets with this product.

Thanks again for indulging me.



To: LindyBill who wrote (33971)10/28/2000 3:12:16 PM
From: Thomas Mercer-Hursh  Respond to of 54805
 
It is simply an improvement on present technology.

I'm not sure this is totally clear yet. They are certainly taking a different route to achieve x86 compatability than other are, so there may be aspects of this route that will prove to be disruptive in time. In the short run, their decision to compete on the x86 front tends to make it seem less different than it might prove to be longer term -- not predicting, mind you, just saying that it might be.