Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (2942)	10/29/2000 11:18:21 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

I'm not saying there is a God, or that he she or it is or is not bounded- I am MERELY saying that it is possible to imagine a God not bound by such limitations. Which, I think, is what E was getting at.

To: cosmicforce who wrote (2942)	10/30/2000 1:11:46 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

The whole issue of "religion-motivated medical neglect" raises difficult ethical questions. What do we do if a parent denies a child necessary medical care in a life-threatening situation, claiming that interference with this decision would constitute a violation of their (the parents) freedom of religion. Personally, I would say treat the child and lock the parents up if required to keep them from interfering: when anyone's practice of religion impinges on someone else's rights, the rights of the someone else should take precedence. But that's just my opinion.