To: Jill who wrote (11311 ) 11/3/2000 12:54:31 AM From: zello Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 65232 Jill, it takes two to tango and unfortunately irresponsible (assuming) men are never held accountable to be responsible by helping raise and paying for the child they helped create if an irresponsible woman destroys the evidence. Every woman should hold them responsible and themselves responsible by not killing their own baby. Killing an innocent life as the solution to irresponsibility should never be an option. Referring to a baby inside his or her mother's womb with the scientific term of embryo and to killing him/her as aborting is an inadequate way of dealing with the guilt of violating one's own conscience and the God-given nature to procreate, nurture, and protect, while trying to justify the murder of an innocent life . The sad part is that numerous young women believe the lie only to come out of the surgery with post-abortion depression and alone. PM me if you would like to discuss this further as I am sure the rest of this thread would rather discuss issues that deal with the accumulation of wealth. Like I said, the married white male has no voice. When he expresses his voice, even humorously, he is told to wear a condom and called (by roserrsp) "very disturbing." Thank you for proving my point. The proud responsible father of a beautiful 2 year old girl, blonde hair and blue eyes, born on Christmas morning in 1997, Zello PS - Why a deer and not a cow or pig (oh you may eat those)? Fact - animals and the earth have no intelligence or soul. When you can measure their IQ let me know. They are guided only by the instinct to survive and occasionally by positive and negative trained responses (i.e. Pavlov's dogs). Your argument is that an unborn baby is unconscious therefore they are expendable and the mother of that baby who is conscious should have the right to destroy them without consequence. So if you were to get in a car accident and become unconscious could we then pull the plug on you without consequence? I believe that is called murder. If a pregnant woman is murdered and the baby inside of her dies is the person who commits the crime charged for single or double homicide? The answer is the latter. The death of that unconscious baby is considered and tried as a murder. So only a mother has the right to kill the baby in her womb without consequence. So much for this great democracy and the "dedication to the proposition that all men (and women) are created equal" - Abraham Lincoln, the Gettysburg address. Touche' Back to QCOM. GO MIGHTY Q! Voltster, when should RMBS take off? How long do you think this buying opp. will last? I have been buying like crazy. Got some at $41 along with the pile I bought in the mid sixties. I knew my last piece would get me in trouble but I couldn't resist. It's so true. Your married white male moral minority friend who was told to wear a condom (not the method of choice by my wife and me) and referred to by roserrsp as a "very disturbing person not to be taken as a compliment" (Tom, you have been called much worse than that - all I get is "very disturbing." I like my former description...porch chaplain, much more complimentary, don't ya think?) who is voting for Bush and strongly believes in the business models of QCOM, RMBS and hoping that JDSU triples in the next 10 years, Zello