SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tradeyourstocks who wrote (86273)11/5/2000 10:12:53 AM
From: kech  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
I agree the switch to GSM would be pointless. T always used switches that would allow an easier transition to CDMA if necessary. The question then (for me anyway) is why wait for W-CDMA rather than go CDMA now?

The only motivation I can think if is that maybe they don't want to be a direct competitor to VERIZON and Sprint using CDMA on which they have a head start. Is there a possible motivation that says, if we maintain our upgrade path through EDGE and then W-CDMA, then not only is the expense lower initially (i.e. we spend less up front) but we hang on to all our customers who keep using their existing phones (either TDMA or analog) because they aren't very sophisticated users. The key here is that the move through EDGE reduces CHURN compared to going to CDMA now (even though CDMA now cheaper in the long run). Still the thing that really favor a switch to CDMA for T is that they could do it in all the slivers of spectrum that they have available and wouldn't need to get a 5mhz swath. A CDMA upgrade (not W-CDMA) would almost seem to be the only way to go from this perspective.


On balance, the fear of CHURN and avoidance of near term capital expenditures is the only thing that must be keeping T away from CDMA. I can't buy the story that "technologists" can't admit to being wrong. They made a decision 6-7 years ago, by and large it hasn't hurt the franchise. Even then they knew they might need to switch. It is time to move on. What they hey, Armstrong has already admitted mistakes with his "bundling" strategy and that was only 2 years ago.



To: tradeyourstocks who wrote (86273)11/5/2000 4:51:42 PM
From: waverider  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Do we know for sure AT&T is ripping out the CDMA San Diego network...or that they are actually doing it now? I have heard various opinions from other sources than their official party line. So far the GTE phones are still working and the CDMA network is in full use. Are they constructing a whole new site for the TDMA stuff while letting the CDMA run until they are ready? I don't know.
Anyone else have a solid clue?

Rick