Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (33918)	11/5/2000 6:58:31 PM
From: Don Lloyd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

CB - ...40 States Forfeit Health Care Funds for Poor Children... If one were to look hard enough, it would seem likely that these Federal funds come with several kinds of mandates, regulations and ropes attached, along with the possibility of added state matching funds needed. A couple of months ago there were published stories that indicated that the Clinton Administration was primarily responsible for the states not having been able to use the funds. I have no other information on the details. Regards, Don

To: Ilaine who wrote (33918)	11/6/2000 7:28:36 AM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

>>>>40 States Forfeit Health Care Funds for Poor Children<<<< Yes CB. With 40 state screwing-up no doubt a few Democratic governors have been snagged. It's all much worse than I originally thought. So much for your agrument that states are perfectly capable of providing these services to citizens. They're not even capable of keeping their hands on the money after three years. So much for national goals, uniformity of application and fairness...So much for the New Federalism.