SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Hurst who wrote (59910)11/5/2000 7:33:57 PM
From: SecularBull  Respond to of 769670
 
The coalition was not in favor of taking Saddam out. President Bush (the first one) did not have that as an option. Nice revisionist history (or selective memory).

LoF



To: Don Hurst who wrote (59910)11/5/2000 8:30:11 PM
From: Selectric II  Respond to of 769670
 
I guess I failed to explain my point.

First, we had no legal authority to take Saddam out. If we had done so, we would have made more enemies than friends in the Middle East. We would have destabilized the region. Iran and Iraq were keeping each other at bay, which was what the world wanted. Everyone wanted Saddam out of Kuwait, but nobody wanted the U.S. deciding unilaterally who in the Middle East gets taken out.

Second, we didn't know where Saddam was. To take him out would have required a door-to-door ground war in cities, with lots of casualties, both US military and Iraqi civilian. The media already was making a big deal out of civilian casualties, which Saddam picked up on early and used to his propaganda benefit. Remember the videos of people scurrying about a bombed-out building, wearing jump suits with, "Infant Formula Factory," or such words, printed in ENGLISH on their backs? It was probably a biological warfare agent factory, but unnerved some. Imagine what would have happened, had we sent ground troops into Baghdad to find Saddam, and started suffering massive ground warfare casualties of US troops and Iraqi civilians in door-to-door fighting. No, thanks.



To: Don Hurst who wrote (59910)11/5/2000 9:03:58 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
<<BTW, now 50 to 43, Gore over Bush in Michigan.>>

And the Democratic get out to vote effort in places like Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania should be unprecedented. In a wise and progressive gesture, the big automakers agreed to a labor contract provision that gives UAW members a day off on election day. You can bet they will be hitting the streets hard for Gore and some of the Democratic candidates in close Senate races.