Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Technocrat who wrote (28034)	11/5/2000 9:32:17 PM
From: David Andersen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29386

Technocrat: Why would QLGC switches go to EMC through McData instead of directly to EMC. EMC recently qualified Q's 16 port switch.

To: Technocrat who wrote (28034)	11/6/2000 7:00:22 AM
From: KJ. Moy	Respond to of 29386

Kurt, Thanks for the G2. This is very good news. May be, just may be performance superiority is a desirable thing. May be, just may be our years of believing in Ancor had some truth in it, not just a myth. May be some of the non-believers will change their mind even they made tons of money already. LOL. KJ

To: Technocrat who wrote (28034)	11/6/2000 2:06:43 PM
From: The Freep	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29386

Technocrat -- thanks for the info, but as a longtime, confused, nontechie, overly-whipsawed QNCR investor, I am a little unclear on a few things that maybe you can help me with. Subassembly? Do you mean that McData is now (at least sometimes) rebranding the Q switch as the McData switch? Or is it the Q asic now being the root of the McData switch? Would Q in turn announce an OEM win with McData? Is this more a reseller agreement? As you can see. . . while I'm excited by the thought of this news, I don't fully grasp it. :-) Thanks for any followup and thanks again for your fascinating posts through the years. the freep