SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : ASK Vendit Off Topic Questions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rx4pain who wrote (15983)11/7/2000 11:36:27 AM
From: horsegirl48  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19374
 
This is a very difficult subject for me as I have expressed before. We all have our beliefs and entitled to them. Animal suffering in any way is a terrible thing for human beings to inflict on other creatures. On the other side of the coin if this is all we have avaiable to us it deems human beings the right to find cures in any way they can. I just wish the world was a easier place were problems like this would not exist, but they do. So I read and read about the wonderful things this era is finding out to end the suffering of mankind, unfortuantely at the expense of animals.
HG48



To: rx4pain who wrote (15983)11/7/2000 7:17:53 PM
From: DOUG H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19374
 
The fallacy of computer modeling for reactions to chemicals is a silly argument.

Can you explain why?



To: rx4pain who wrote (15983)11/7/2000 11:36:21 PM
From: Walkingshadow  Respond to of 19374
 
<< The fallacy of computer modeling for reactions to chemicals is a silly argument. >>

Shhhhhhhhh! Don't tell silly ol' Craig Venter. He'll have to close up his silly shop, put a halt to his silly plans, and then I'd have to sell my silly Celera. Don't wanna have to do that. Ever. <vbg>

;-)

WS