Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (39216)	11/8/2000 10:45:03 AM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 70976

It is unfortunate that politics tends to take on a polarizing effect when the reality is the candidates are rather close in beliefs when you look at the big picture as someone from France, Italy, Russia or China might. I look for the winner to move back to a more centralist position after they take office. We voted for gridlock and you hope that they honor this mandate. Funny thing is Gore conceded to Bush then called to take it back later on. Some things never change! LOL!

To: michael97123 who wrote (39216)	11/8/2000 2:21:23 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

re: Whole system is a dinosaur anyway: Right. The system has not been updated, since the original 1700s version. It looks like more citizens voted for Gore, but Bush will be President, because the Founding Fathers didn't really totally believe in democracy. They created the Electoral College, to stand between the voters and the decision. There is also a tremendous resistance to making the voting process easy. If I can do all my Christmas shopping, enter limit buy and sell orders at my broker, switch money between bank accounts, all over the phone or internet, and do it at 2 a.m. on a Sunday, then I ought to be able to vote that way also. Voting by mail is just a stepping-stone on the way to a totally instantaneous, electronic system. And the referendum system is just a stepping-stone on the way from the obsolete representative-democracy system to direct democracy. I don't think the electors are allowed to defect. Was the election just a suggestion, and the electors can do whatever they want? If they do, it might create enough of a mess that the country finally considers junking the Electoral College. If the Congress needs to sort out the mess, and the Senate is split exactly 50-50, and the tie-breaker (the Vice President) hasn't been chosen, then what? They should give Washington D.C. a single Senator, so ties can't happen. You're right about continuing gridlock. The Republicans will have razor-thin majorities in Congress, and whoever is President won't have a mandate, and won't be able to do anything. We will not see any big tax cuts, any resolution of health care issues, or any big initiatives on any crucial issues. And Greenspan will get what he wants: continuing debt reductions. Hopefully, we can all just forget about Washington, and get on with making money and living out lives. Sort of like a good software program, it's working well if you don't notice it's there.