Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (35235)	11/8/2000 3:44:16 PM
From: IceShark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Yes.

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (35235)	11/8/2000 3:51:21 PM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

No heinz. They're not illiterate. The names of the candidates appeared on both sides of the ballot with the punch holes in the middle. The numbering of the candidates on each side of the ballot (left and right sides) did not obviously or easily correspond to the holes in the center. This kind of dual sided butterfly ballot was unfamiliar to voters who traditionally see names on only one side (left) which correspond directly to the holes. The fact that this was questioned at the polls during the election by voters and poll watchers and election judges failed to clarify will be hard to ignore in court.

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (35235)	11/8/2000 3:53:54 PM
From: Alias Shrugged	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

>>>how can you 'mistakenly' vote for someone else? i'd love to see for myself how that was done... are they all illiterate or something?>> WTF are you talking about? Remember, this is the same country that, when CNBS touts some company with ticker symbol GLTC, huge volume spikes occur in stocks with symbols GTLC, GCTL, GLCT, etc. etc. Any questions???