Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (35288)	11/8/2000 5:03:37 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Sounds good enough to me: maybe they can test this out "scientifically" for confusion...

To: Ilaine who wrote (35288)	11/8/2000 5:08:14 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Well... If your elderly, used to always seeing a list of names on the left, and you were in a hurry.... Where's your compassionate understanding? -g- I hope Bush gets it though. pearly.

To: Ilaine who wrote (35288)	11/8/2000 6:11:05 PM
From: Sunny Jim	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

<<It's not my fault, blame the person who designed it>> The ultimate safety net - the net against carelessness and stupidity. We've gone a long way in this country, and this is could be the logical extension of it all. It will set a great precedent - if you don't like the election outcome find a loophole and sue for your outcome. With all the different ballots in the country (and all the incompetent people) future elections will be a heyday for the lawyers. I knew they were looking for new business after the tobacco heist, but I didn't envision there was enough money in election suits to feed them all. No offense intended, Cobalt, but I think we have gotten carried away with everyone looking for their pound of flesh in the courts these days. (I can just see the response i'll get for this opinion)