Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (35338)	11/8/2000 6:54:50 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

I believe the correct legal response to those who got "confused" regarding the ballot layout will be: "Tough titty, said the kitty...milk's gone dry!"<G>

To: Ilaine who wrote (35338)	11/8/2000 7:16:23 PM
From: chic_hearne	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

The question would be whether the ballot was so confusing as to invalidate the election. I heard a woman on Palm Beach TV, via C-Span, saying she "might" have made a mistake. The ballots are secret, so who can say who cast which ballot? If you were arguing that the Palm Beach vote was valid, what would be your defense to the fact that Buchanan recieved 20% of his total vote from Palm Beach and also that the socialist candidate recieved 50% of his vote from Palm Beach, while Palm beach only makes up 7% of the state and it's heavily Democrat? These are the 2000 votes to put Gore over the top.