Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (3182)	11/8/2000 10:16:54 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5582

But the touts will say that's old news. And I say, once a scummy company, always a scummy company.

To: StockDung who wrote (3182)	11/8/2000 11:50:10 PM
From: Eric Fader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5582

Floyd, you must be off your medication again. Didn't I tell you to post CURRENT stuff? You admitted to me on the phone that, despite all your searching through all the sources you're so proud of, you couldn't find anything negative about GumTech or its current management, so you were looking for dirt on Steven Muth. I said "go right ahead," but now you're posting 4-year-old releases about events that took place nine years ago, pure crap with nothing whatsoever to do with GumTech. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FREAKING MIND??! I'm putting you on "ignore" and I suggest that anyone reading my post, and who realizes how bizarre it is for you to spend all your time posting utter garbage with the apparent sole purpose of blocking legitimate discussion of a stock, do the same. Do you think the new investors who are reading this thread tonight want to read all your irrelevant sh!t? Oh, I forgot. That's exactly the idea, isn't it. Little Stevie Worthington needs a lackey to chase away all intelligent thought from this thread, and you're it. I really thought you were a decent guy who just liked being a gadfly, and we had some interesting conversations. We swapped stories about a sleazy small-time stock promoter with a fondness for Jack Daniels. I even sent you a Private Message suggesting that you edit a post (on another thread) that could have gotten you in trouble, and you did so and thanked me. But reading your prodigious and utterly useless output from this evening made me realize, you're just an a$$hole who enjoys f@cking with other people's investments for your own personal amusement and for the benefit of a lying short-seller who you enjoy sucking up to. That's just not a characteristic of anyone I want to have anything to do with ever again. Seeya!