SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe S Pack who wrote (5237)11/8/2000 11:19:00 PM
From: KyrosL  Respond to of 10042
 
I fully agree on both counts.

I think the spectacle of a president that has not been popularly elected will be enough to trigger the process to change the constitution. In time, even Bush and the Republicans will come to realize this. I can see a challenge to the legitimacy of a Bush presidency in the media and the world that will make governing almost impossible. By the way, I don't think that Gore and the Democrats would have behaved any differently, had they won the electoral but not the popular vote. It's the law of the land after all -- one fit for the 18th century.

Interestingly, Shields revealed in Lehrer News Hour today that the Republicans were preparing an elaborate legal challenge to the legitimacy of a Gore presidency, had Gore won the electoral but not the popular vote, which according to the pundits was the more probable outcome.

Kyros



To: Joe S Pack who wrote (5237)11/9/2000 7:23:17 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042
 
<<Get rid of electoral voting system which was established two hundred plus years ago by thirteen states. >>

No, it is the only factor which gives the populations of the smallest states any voice in national matters which concern them greatly..