SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (65385)11/9/2000 8:54:34 AM
From: HighTech  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
I wasn't whining, I just proposed a solution to the fraudulent ballot

What was fraudulent about the ballot? Fraud is intentional deception. A democrat approved it, it was used in prior elections, and the voters had a chance, not only from its use in prior elections but also from the copies that were provided for preview and acceptance, to challenge it before the election. Your argument and claim is bogus.

HiTech



To: Ish who wrote (65385)11/9/2000 9:01:58 AM
From: microhoogle!  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
Ish,
Democrats may have designed it. But if they designed it poorly does not imply that their candidate should be disqualified on that basis alone. Actually both parties are involved in this process and everyone involved should be held accountable. Voters should not be punished for poor design.
Having said that, I think both candidates should start working out a formula before things get any more messier.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News